Am 07.01.2020 um 23:10 schrieb Fergus Daly:
I'm just not up to it, but given the trivial nature of the single required
patch, is there anybody out there who could take this on for the Cygwin
provision?
(There must be 00s of users who need it? I'm truly surprised that grap, or
rather its lack,
>> Try following patch.
--- configure.ac.orig 2014-08-31 00:33:45.0 +0900
+++ configure.ac2020-01-07 08:43:59.559103700 +0900
@@ -45,10 +45,10 @@
AC_MSG_CHECKING(if ${CXX} supports -std=c++0x)
old_cxxflags="$CXXFLAGS"
old_cppflags="$CPPFLAGS"
-CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -std=c++0x"
-
>> Try following patch.
--- configure.ac.orig 2014-08-31 00:33:45.0 +0900
+++ configure.ac2020-01-07 08:43:59.559103700 +0900
@@ -45,10 +45,10 @@
AC_MSG_CHECKING(if ${CXX} supports -std=c++0x)
old_cxxflags="$CXXFLAGS"
old_cppflags="$CPPFLAGS"
-CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -std=c++0x"
-
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 16:39:43 -0500
"bonh...@uklinux.net" wrote:
> I have a version of grap, being
> grap 1.42 compiled under CYGWIN_NT-6.1 1.5.25(0.156/4/2)
> compiled (guessing) more than a decade ago. It still works, which is a good
> thing, because if I try to compile the current version
> https:
On 2020-01-06 14:39, bonh...@uklinux.net wrote:
> I have a version of grap, being
> grap 1.42 compiled under CYGWIN_NT-6.1 1.5.25(0.156/4/2)
> compiled (guessing) more than a decade ago. It still works, which is a good
> thing, because if I try to compile the current version
> https://www.lunabase.
I have a version of grap, being
grap 1.42 compiled under CYGWIN_NT-6.1 1.5.25(0.156/4/2)
compiled (guessing) more than a decade ago. It still works, which is a good
thing, because if I try to compile the current version
https://www.lunabase.org/~faber/Vault/software/grap/grap-1.45.tar.gz
with the c
6 matches
Mail list logo