On 5/29/2013 8:18 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Sorry for this blast from the past, but cygutils have been updated a few
times and I still get the same error... has the patch not been applied or is
there something else that needs fixing?
No, thanks for the reminder. I completely dropped the ball on th
Charles Wilson cwilson.fastmail.fm> writes:
> On 4/27/2012 4:20 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Fixing cygdrop.
>
> Thanks for the patch; I'm pretty busy this weekend but I'll try to roll
> out a new cygutils release Monday or so.
Sorry for this blast from the past, but cygutils have been update
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Fixing cygdrop.
$ net helpmsg 122
The data area passed to a system call is too small.
A quick look into the sources shows that the maximum buffer size for
the group list returned by GetTokenInformation is wrongly computed:
max_groups = 100;
char groups_buf[s
On 4/27/2012 4:20 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Fixing cygdrop.
Thanks for the patch; I'm pretty busy this weekend but I'll try to roll
out a new cygutils release Monday or so.
If anybody wants to investigate the following over the weekend:
TODO (call for patches):
==
On Apr 27 07:33, Achim Gratz wrote:
> > Charles Wilson writes:
> > > The "cygdrop.exe" utility is part of the cygutils package.
>
> (1001)~ # cygdrop -v ls
> GetTokenInformation: error 122
> (1002)~ # cygdrop ls
> GetTokenInformation: error 122
> (1003)~ # cygdrop
> Usage: cygdrop [OPTIONS] COMMAN
> Charles Wilson writes:
> > The "cygdrop.exe" utility is part of the cygutils package.
(1001)~ # cygdrop -v ls
GetTokenInformation: error 122
(1002)~ # cygdrop ls
GetTokenInformation: error 122
(1003)~ # cygdrop
Usage: cygdrop [OPTIONS] COMMAND [ARG ...]
Group options
-lDisable local a
Charles Wilson writes:
> The "cygdrop.exe" utility is part of the cygutils package.
Thank you.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada
--
Proble
On 4/26/2012 4:33 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
>
> I've recently had a test fail because I started it with administrator
> privileges (via the Administrator group). The test tried to write to a
> file that it set read-only before and of course as an administrator it
> was still able to write to it. So
I've recently had a test fail because I started it with administrator
privileges (via the Administrator group). The test tried to write to a
file that it set read-only before and of course as an administrator it
was still able to write to it. So the test fail wasn't really that
important, but I
9 matches
Mail list logo
