On 9/8/10, Eric Blake ebl...@russianhut.comie wrote:
On 09/08/2010 09:24 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
To somewhat sooth your curiousity, Windows (or perhaps it's more accurate
to say NTFS) ain't great with directories with a large number of files.
I expect you would be less than impressed
On 9/7/10, Larry Hall (Cygwin) reply-to-list-only...@xxx.com wrote:
On 9/7/2010 12:05 PM, mike marchywka wrote:
this takes a few minutes on old debian machine, taking much longer
here on same data-
about 19k file about 24Gb total size.
Windoze finally has better perf stuff but still no help-
On 9/8/2010 9:35 AM, mike marchywka wrote:
On 9/7/10, Larry Hall (Cygwin)reply-to-list-only...@xxx.com wrote:
On 9/7/2010 12:05 PM, mike marchywka wrote:
this takes a few minutes on old debian machine, taking much longer
here on same data-
about 19k file about 24Gb total size.
Windoze finally
On 09/08/2010 09:24 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
To somewhat sooth your curiousity, Windows (or perhaps it's more accurate
to say NTFS) ain't great with directories with a large number of files.
I expect you would be less than impressed with the performance of of 'dir'
in 'cmd.exe' in the same
this takes a few minutes on old debian machine, taking much longer
here on same data-
about 19k file about 24Gb total size.
Windoze finally has better perf stuff but still no help- one core at
25 pct all kernel
time disk not exactly busy. All the time is in the ls loop not the
find command.
Now
On 9/7/2010 12:05 PM, mike marchywka wrote:
this takes a few minutes on old debian machine, taking much longer
here on same data-
about 19k file about 24Gb total size.
Windoze finally has better perf stuff but still no help- one core at
25 pct all kernel
time disk not exactly busy. All the time
6 matches
Mail list logo
