Re: mkfifo implementation ?

2003-01-14 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:47:36AM +0100, gilles BOURGEOIS wrote: >is mkfifo still not implemented (I read mailing list archive fron end of >2003) , and I ran mkfifo which return -1 (and does not set errno) in my >code. mkfifo is not implemented and it *does* set errno to ENOSYS. -- Unsubscribe i

Re: mkfifo implementation ?

2003-01-14 Thread gilles BOURGEOIS
nt: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Re: mkfifo implementation ? > On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, gilles BOURGEOIS wrote: > > > hi folks, > > is mkfifo still not implemented (I read mailing list archive fron end of > > 2003) , and I ran mkfifo which return -1 (and does not set

Re: mkfifo implementation ?

2003-01-14 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, gilles BOURGEOIS wrote: > hi folks, > is mkfifo still not implemented (I read mailing list archive fron end of > 2003) , and I ran mkfifo which return -1 (and does not set errno) in my > code. Yes. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug repo

mkfifo implementation ?

2003-01-14 Thread gilles BOURGEOIS
hi folks, is mkfifo still not implemented (I read mailing list archive fron end of 2003) , and I ran mkfifo which return -1 (and does not set errno) in my code. thanks gilles -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Doc