On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 4:11 PM Csaba Ráduly wrote:
>
> On 25/04/2024 15:15, Jon Turney via Cygwin wrote:
> > On 24/04/2024 23:36, Christopher Layne via Cygwin wrote:
> > [...]
> >> If it isn't true then this seems trivial to fix.
> >
> > This assertion is trivially disproven by the lack of a
On 25/04/2024 15:15, Jon Turney via Cygwin wrote:
On 24/04/2024 23:36, Christopher Layne via Cygwin wrote:
[...]
If it isn't true then this seems trivial to fix.
This assertion is trivially disproven by the lack of a patch attached. :)
I don't think this is worth a gold star, but a jester's
On 24/04/2024 23:36, Christopher Layne via Cygwin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:11:52PM +, Christopher Layne via Cygwin wrote:
Based on past threads I've read I believe the issue is actually with
windows not allowing a symlink to be created with a non-existent target,
but I do know
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:11:52PM +, Christopher Layne via Cygwin wrote:
> Based on past threads I've read I believe the issue is actually with
> windows not allowing a symlink to be created with a non-existent target,
> but I do know windows does not care if you break a link after the fact.
Since I recently sent an email about symlinks and cygdrive mounts, I
figured I'd report another issue that's plagued me over the years and
that I know others have reported in the past: You can't create native
symlinks to non-existent targets and this causes a bunch of issues when
rsyncing
5 matches
Mail list logo