Achim Gratz wrote:
> Brian Inglis writes:
> >>> Cygwin packages are granular and dependencies are functional: which
> >>> of the Cygwin packages opam and opam-installer uses Cygwin package
> >>> ocaml- compiler-libs, or does opam use another ocaml package to build?
>
> >> I don't quite understand
Brian Inglis writes:
>>> Cygwin packages are granular and dependencies are functional: which of the
>>> Cygwin packages opam and opam-installer uses Cygwin package ocaml-
>>> compiler-libs, or does opam use another ocaml package to build?
>> I don't quite understand your question - opam is
On 2020-06-08 03:14, David Allsopp via Cygwin wrote:
> Brian Inglis wrote:
>> On 2020-05-28 03:28, David Allsopp via Cygwin wrote:
>>> opam assumes that OCaml installed by the "OS" package manager is
>> "complete"
>>> (i.e. is the same as "make install" from the OCaml sources), which is
>>> a
Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2020-05-28 03:28, David Allsopp via Cygwin wrote:
> > opam assumes that OCaml installed by the "OS" package manager is
> "complete"
> > (i.e. is the same as "make install" from the OCaml sources), which is
> > a problem when "OS" package managers split upstream ocaml and
On 2020-05-28 03:28, David Allsopp via Cygwin wrote:
> opam assumes that OCaml installed by the "OS" package manager is "complete"
> (i.e. is the same as "make install" from the OCaml sources), which is a
> problem when "OS" package managers split upstream ocaml and don't install
> the
opam assumes that OCaml installed by the "OS" package manager is "complete"
(i.e. is the same as "make install" from the OCaml sources), which is a
problem when "OS" package managers split upstream ocaml and don't install
the ocaml-compiler-libs package by default.
Please could either the opam or
6 matches
Mail list logo
