--On Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:39 PM +1000 Robert Collins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > What is the 'System process'?
>>
>> Look at the output from the Task Manager.
>
> Sure, there's no 'System process'. Do you mean the
> 'System Idle process' aka the scheduler?
>
> Rob
No, it's a separ
--On Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:23 AM -0400 Christopher Faylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:59:08PM -0400, Alan Dobkin wrote:
>> I don't intend to submit a patch for this either, at least not
>> any time soon, but I would be happy to provide information and
>> testi
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ps command - revisited
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:03:15PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
&g
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:03:15PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alan Dobkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:59 PM
>
>>Similarly, the System process should be identified as such instead of
>>unknown.
>
>What is the 'System proc
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:59:08PM -0400, Alan Dobkin wrote:
>>The functionality you see now is all that I plan on providing.
>>
>>Patches are, as always, gratefully accepted, however.
>
>I don't intend to submit a patch for this either, at least not any time
>soon, but I would be happy to provide
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Dobkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:59 PM
> Similarly,
> the System process should be identified as such instead of unknown.
What is the 'System process'?
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsub
--On Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:08 PM -0400 Christopher Faylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As with so many other things in Cygwin, what you see is what
> you get from the underlying Windows API that we're using. If
> certain processes aren't showing up when we say "give me all
> of your proc
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:59:36PM -0400, Alan Dobkin wrote:
>I don't know why Chris's process isn't showing up, but I can attest to
>the fact that all Windows processes, including those associated with
>services *do* appear in the ps -W output, with only two exceptions: the
>System Idle Process (
I don't know why Chris's process isn't showing up, but I can
attest to the fact that all Windows processes, including those
associated with services *do* appear in the ps -W output, with
only two exceptions: the System Idle Process (PID #0) and the
CSRSS.EXE (Client/Server Run-Time Subsystem)
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:17:42PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi all, specially Corinna,
>
>Corinna, maybe you can help out here. The UNIX ps command reports all and
>every process running on the machine, the Windows (cygwin) ps command
>however, omits WinNT/Win2K services, which is somethin
TECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 23:44
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: ps command - revisited
>
> Been there, done that - that's not it. I can see this process in 'Task
> Manager':
> admsrvc.exe, pid=508, it's runn
---
> From: Roland Glenn McIntosh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 5:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Ruprecht, Chris
> Subject: Re: ps command - revisited
>
>
> *sigh* RTFM.
>
> ps -Wef
>
> -rgm
>
> At 05:17 P
*sigh* RTFM.
ps -Wef
-rgm
At 05:17 PM 04.09.2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi all, specially Corinna,
>
>Corinna, maybe you can help out here. The UNIX ps command reports all and
>every process running on the machine, the Windows (cygwin) ps command
>however, omits WinNT/Win2K services, which
Hi all, specially Corinna,
Corinna, maybe you can help out here. The UNIX ps command reports all and
every process running on the machine, the Windows (cygwin) ps command
however, omits WinNT/Win2K services, which is something we would like to
have working. Would it be possible to extent the curr
14 matches
Mail list logo
