On Dec 1 08:49, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2018-12-01 02:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov 30 21:27, Brian Inglis wrote:
> >> $ head /{etc,usr/lib}/os-release
> >> ==> /etc/os-release <==
> >> PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch)"
> >> NAME="Debian GNU/Linux"
> >> VERSION_ID="9"
> >>
On 2018-12-01 02:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 30 21:27, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> On 2018-11-30 05:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Nov 30 07:43, James E. King III wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:23 AM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 29 17:38, James E. King III wrote:
>> On
On Nov 30 21:27, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2018-11-30 05:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov 30 07:43, James E. King III wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:23 AM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> On Nov 29 17:38, James E. King III wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:18 AM Corinna Vinschen
On 2018-11-30 05:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 30 07:43, James E. King III wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:23 AM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Nov 29 17:38, James E. King III wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:18 AM Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I created a patch and uploaded new
On Nov 30 07:43, James E. King III wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:23 AM Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 29 17:38, James E. King III wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:18 AM Corinna Vinschen
> > > > I created a patch and uploaded new developer snapshots to
> > > >
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:23 AM Corinna Vinschen
wrote:
>
> On Nov 29 17:38, James E. King III wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:18 AM Corinna Vinschen
> > > I created a patch and uploaded new developer snapshots to
> > > https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ Please give them a try.
> >
> > This
On Nov 29 17:38, James E. King III wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:18 AM Corinna Vinschen
> > I created a patch and uploaded new developer snapshots to
> > https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ Please give them a try.
>
> This fixed the issue for me. What's the best way to detect cygwin
> with this
ov 25 09:01, James E. King III wrote:
> > > > > I have isolated a problem in pthread_cond_timedwait when the condattr
> > > > > is used to set the clock type to CLOCK_MONOTONIC. In this case even
> > > > > though a target time point in the future
On Nov 26 17:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 26 10:47, James E. King III wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:35 AM Corinna Vinschen
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Nov 25 09:01, James E. King III wrote:
> > > > I have isolated a problem in pthread_con
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;h=0b868df147d613b6f277161eff4ac2834aa24ee7
commit 0b868df147d613b6f277161eff4ac2834aa24ee7
Author: Corinna Vinschen
Date: Wed Nov 28 23:49:59 2018 +0100
Cygwin: pthread_cond_timedwait: make sure to wait until abstime finishes
Diff
On Nov 26 10:47, James E. King III wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:35 AM Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 25 09:01, James E. King III wrote:
> > > I have isolated a problem in pthread_cond_timedwait when the condattr
> > > is used to s
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:35 AM Corinna Vinschen
wrote:
>
> On Nov 25 09:01, James E. King III wrote:
> > I have isolated a problem in pthread_cond_timedwait when the condattr
> > is used to set the clock type to CLOCK_MONOTONIC. In this case even
> > though a target
On Nov 25 09:01, James E. King III wrote:
> I have isolated a problem in pthread_cond_timedwait when the condattr
> is used to set the clock type to CLOCK_MONOTONIC. In this case even
> though a target time point in the future is specified, the call
> returns ETIMEDOUT but a sub
I have isolated a problem in pthread_cond_timedwait when the condattr
is used to set the clock type to CLOCK_MONOTONIC. In this case even
though a target time point in the future is specified, the call
returns ETIMEDOUT but a subsequent call to
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) shows the desired
On Feb 12 12:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to use the pthread_cond_timedwait, but it doesn't seem to
work properly.
It returns immediately with a return value of 116 (ETIMEDOUT) even if I
set the timeout period to e.g. 10 seconds.
I have locked the mutex
Hi,
I have tried to use the pthread_cond_timedwait, but it doesn't seem to
work properly.
It returns immediately with a return value of 116 (ETIMEDOUT) even if I
set the timeout period to e.g. 10 seconds.
I have locked the mutex and initialized the condition variable before
the invokation
In the code below, the timespec argument to pthread_cond_timedwait() is set
to an invalid value: t_nsec 999,999,999 so, EINVAL error code should be
returned.
Regards,
Ivan Mari
#include pthread.h
#include unistd.h
#include stdio.h
#include sys/time.h
#include errno.h
void* start_routine
Sorry, its already fixed in last version.
--
Analog-/ISDN-Nutzer sparen mit GMX SmartSurfer bis zu 70%!
Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
I would like to use this function down to 10 milliseconds accuracy if
possible.
However upon looking at winsup/cygwin/thread.cc,
it uses the function ftime and the millisecond field is ignored.
This is already fixed. Try the snapshot.
Bit do not expect that you can use it with 10 ms delays.
Hi.
I would like to use this function down to 10 milliseconds accuracy if possible.
However upon looking at winsup/cygwin/thread.cc,
it uses the function ftime and the millisecond field is ignored.
All the examples in the winsup testsuite also generally check to 5 seconds only.
Is there any
-Original Message-
From: peter garrone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:42:52 +0800
Subject: pthread_cond_timedwait accurate to one second only
Hi.
I would like to use this function down to 10 milliseconds accuracy if possible.
However upon looking
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of peter garrone
I would like to use this function down to 10 milliseconds
accuracy if possible.
However upon looking at winsup/cygwin/thread.cc,
it uses the function ftime and the millisecond field is ignored.
All the examples in
22 matches
Mail list logo
