Re: qmail, DJB licensing

2004-10-07 Thread Reini Urban
Gary R. Van Sickle schrieb: >cgf: Does maildir even work without resorting to managed mounts? Nope, it can't. Special chars in the filenames which Windows either doesn't support at all or treats differently than Unii. Maildir is a decent idea implemented in a non-POSIX, non-portable manner. And t

RE: qmail, DJB licensing

2004-10-07 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
[Making a conscious decision to snip in-the-clear email addresses, because I'm not Above The Law] > Reini Urban wrote: > > > So we could follow Igor's suggestion providing the sources in the > > binary package and compile it after download. > >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg01654

Re: qmail, DJB licensing

2004-10-07 Thread Brian Dessent
Reini Urban wrote: > So we could follow Igor's suggestion providing the sources in the binary > package and compile it after download. >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg01654.html > At least better than nothing. exim would need a comparative and simplier > MTA. > > I failed with try

Re: qmail, DJB licensing

2004-10-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 06:34:52PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >Christopher Faylor schrieb: >>You might check into how the netqmail does this: >> http://www.qmail.org/netqmail/ >> >>They don't seem to offer binaries, so I assume the licensing problems >>still exist. > >So we could follow Igor's sugg

Re: qmail, DJB licensing

2004-10-07 Thread Reini Urban
Christopher Faylor schrieb: It's vanishingly unlikely that we'll get DJB's approval. True. You might check into how the netqmail does this: http://www.qmail.org/netqmail/ They don't seem to offer binaries, so I assume the licensing problems still exist. So we could follow Igor's suggestion provid

Re: qmail, DJB licensing

2004-10-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 05:18:41PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >What are the isues about qmail license restrictions now? > >Most know that it's vastly "superior" over other MTA's. >(i.e. people tend to like it more) >E.g. sourceware uses qmail > http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#what-software > >

qmail, DJB licensing

2004-10-07 Thread Reini Urban
What are the isues about qmail license restrictions now? Most know that it's vastly "superior" over other MTA's. (i.e. people tend to like it more) E.g. sourceware uses qmail http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#what-software I see in the thread around http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/ms