Christopher Faylor wrote:
Bingo! I guess I should have put an "and" in my first two statements.
You can only have *1* DLL built from the Cygwin source resident and
running at any one time. It wasn't clear to me that this is what you
were doing, otherwise I would have told you that this is a no-
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: 22 April 2004 20:29
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:44:47PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
> >>Or maybe its neither a nor b.. perhaps there's a runtime
> component? Perhaps you
> >>can't run two versions of the cygw
At 03:29 PM 4/22/2004, you wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:44:47PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>>>Or maybe its neither a nor b.. perhaps there's a runtime component? Perhaps you
>>>can't run two versions of the cygwin dll at one time in separate locations?
>>
>>Bingo! I guess I should have put an
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 03:29:00PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:44:47PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>>>Or maybe its neither a nor b.. perhaps there's a runtime component? Perhaps you
>>>can't run two versions of the cygwin dll at one time in separate locations?
>>
>>Bi
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:44:47PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>>Or maybe its neither a nor b.. perhaps there's a runtime component? Perhaps you
>>can't run two versions of the cygwin dll at one time in separate locations?
>
>Bingo! I guess I should have put an "and" in my first two statements.
>You
At 02:24 PM 4/22/2004, you wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:21:58PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>> At 06:29 PM 4/21/2004, you wrote:
>> >all,
>> >
>> >Is there any reason why a recompiled version of cygwin.dll in a non-standard
>> >location
>> >would cause tools that depend on it to fail? I compile
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:21:58PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
> At 06:29 PM 4/21/2004, you wrote:
> >all,
> >
> >Is there any reason why a recompiled version of cygwin.dll in a non-standard
> >location
> >would cause tools that depend on it to fail? I compiled with a standard:
> >
> >configure --pre
At 06:29 PM 4/21/2004, you wrote:
>all,
>
>Is there any reason why a recompiled version of cygwin.dll in a non-standard location
>would cause tools that depend on it to fail? I compiled with a standard:
>
>configure --prefix=
>make
>make install
>
>I need to remove the compiled dll in order to get
all,
Is there any reason why a recompiled version of cygwin.dll in a non-standard location
would cause tools that depend on it to fail? I compiled with a standard:
configure --prefix=
make
make install
I need to remove the compiled dll in order to get anything working again...
Also, any debuggi
9 matches
Mail list logo
