Re: ruby for cygwin comes without "gem" command

2007-05-16 Thread Ben Atkin
As Shankar Unni says, don't try to install gem for cygwin using the gem that comes with the Ruby One-Click Installer for Windows. Instead, get the tarball and install it using the included script. Since rubygems is pure ruby, you don't have to worry about having a compiler installed. It should jus

Re: ruby for cygwin comes without "gem" command

2007-05-15 Thread Shankar Unni
Corinna Vinschen wrote: gem is not part of the ruby standard package. And don't try to install a "native" gem from the main ruby site and download gems using that, or you'll end up with a mishmash of cygwin and native libraries for ruby. Been there, done that :-). -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: ruby for cygwin comes without "gem" command

2007-05-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 14 13:02, Ronald Fischer wrote: > I installed ruby for cygwin, using the cygwin setup program: > > $ ruby --version > ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-25 patchlevel 12) [i386-cygwin] > > > To my surprise, this does not install the "gem" command, which is > normally part of Ruby 1.8.5: gem is not part

ruby for cygwin comes without "gem" command

2007-05-14 Thread Ronald Fischer
I installed ruby for cygwin, using the cygwin setup program: $ ruby --version ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-25 patchlevel 12) [i386-cygwin] To my surprise, this does not install the "gem" command, which is normally part of Ruby 1.8.5: $ which ruby /usr/bin/ruby $ ls /usr/bin/gem ls: cannot access /usr/bi