Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))

2012-02-15 Thread Hans Horn
On 2/14/2012 10:41 PM, Hans Horn wrote: On 2/14/2012 5:39 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: On 2/14/2012 6:00 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: On 2/14/2012 1:05 PM, Hans Horn wrote: something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snap

Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))

2012-02-14 Thread Hans Horn
On 2/14/2012 5:39 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: On 2/14/2012 6:00 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: On 2/14/2012 1:05 PM, Hans Horn wrote: something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt.

Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))

2012-02-14 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >On 2/14/2012 6:00 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: >> On 2/14/2012 1:05 PM, Hans Horn wrote: >>> something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots >>> (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. >> >> I'll need a few more details than "i

Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))

2012-02-14 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/14/2012 6:00 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 2/14/2012 1:05 PM, Hans Horn wrote: >> something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots >> (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. > > I'll need a few more details than "it broke rxvt". vis. cgf's reply, never mind... -- Problem reports:

Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))

2012-02-14 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/14/2012 1:05 PM, Hans Horn wrote: > something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots > (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. I'll need a few more details than "it broke rxvt". -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin

Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))

2012-02-14 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:05:37AM -0800, Hans Horn wrote: >Folks, > >something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots >(20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. Even though this terminal is abandoned >it is still my favorite one due to its simple copy/past abilities. I >hate to see it go

Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))

2012-02-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 14 10:05, Hans Horn wrote: > Folks, > > something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots > (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. Even though this terminal is > abandoned it is still my favorite one due to its simple copy/past > abilities. I hate to see it go away. > Reverted to 1.

rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))

2012-02-14 Thread Hans Horn
Folks, something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. Even though this terminal is abandoned it is still my favorite one due to its simple copy/past abilities. I hate to see it go away. Reverted to 1.7.10.. Any clues what might have caused th