setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-02 Thread Robert Collins
Marcel Telka wrote: On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:58:39PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: Fantastic. I'm reinstating all the code now, .10 will be up in ~ 5 mins and (cross fingers) will also work well... no crash (1000 runs). Fantastic. Thank you * very* much for your, oh, 8000 test runs. Thank *

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-02 Thread Marcel Telka
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 12:20:22AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > Marcel Telka wrote: > >Thank *you* very much for fix this bug. I'm looking for new official setup > >release soon :-). > > > > Indeed, and here it is: > http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.10.2.1.exe The version

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-03 Thread Alan Dobkin
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > Indeed, and here it is: > http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.10.2.1.exe I haven't experienced any setup crashes, but I have a question about it's behavior when used with the local directory option. Each time I run it against a

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-03 Thread Robert Collins
Alan Dobkin wrote: On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote: Indeed, and here it is: http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.10.2.1.exe I haven't experienced any setup crashes, but I have a question about it's behavior when used with the local directory option. Each time I r

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-03 Thread Alan Dobkin
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > Alan Dobkin wrote: > > > > Each time I run it against a local mirror, it checks the MD5 sum > > of every package in the mirror. This is a time-consuming process > > and, unless the window remains in the foreground the entire time, > > it seems to h

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-03 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 07:48, Alan Dobkin wrote: > I do see the status bar and it does update fine as long as I leave > the setup window in the foreground. However, as soon as I click on > another window to let it process in the background, that's when the > behavior I described occurs. I hav

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-03 Thread Alan Dobkin
On 4 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 07:48, Alan Dobkin wrote: > > > > > My question is this: Why is it necessary to scan every package > > > > in the mirror every time setup is run against a local mirror? > > > > Most of the time, I am only installing a single packag

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-04 Thread Max Bowsher
Alan Dobkin wrote: > On 4 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > >> you should use apache or IIS to serve out the mirror and add >> it to your mirror selection creen in the custom URL field. >> >> Then, setup won't check the md5's of every package. > > This seems like an overly complex workaround just t

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-04 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 10:45, Alan Dobkin wrote: > I didn't mean to imply that it doesn't work now, only that the method > I've used to create the mirror doesn't seem to be the problem. It's not the problem, it's just how you are using the mirror :}. > > It's also clearly noted that cygwins loca

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-04 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 19:22, Max Bowsher wrote: > Alan Dobkin wrote: > > On 4 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > > > >> you should use apache or IIS to serve out the mirror and add > >> it to your mirror selection creen in the custom URL field. > >> > >> Then, setup won't check the md5's of every pa

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-04 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
I've been following this discussion from the sidelines for a while.. hope you don't mind be butting in. On 4 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > Setup doesn't have a concept of a local mirror. It has a 'local package > dir', where it caches packages during install. The mirroring scripts > around cr

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-04 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > [snip] > On 4 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > > Setup doesn't have a concept of a local mirror. It has a 'local package > > dir', where it caches packages during install. The mirroring scripts > > around create the same layout as setup uses fo

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-04 Thread Randall R Schulz
Igor, At 06:18 2003-04-04, you wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > Just a thought - I'm not a lawyer, so you can safely ignore me > (although I am married with a lawyer.. does that help?) > rlc IANALBIMTO [1]? Hmm... Igor [1] I Am Not A Lawyer But I'm Married To One U

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-04 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: > Igor, > > At 06:18 2003-04-04, you wrote: > >On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > > > > Just a thought - I'm not a lawyer, so you can safely ignore me > > > (although I am married with a lawyer.. does that help?) > > > rlc > > > >IANA

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-04 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: > Igor, > At 06:18 2003-04-04, you wrote: > >On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > > > > Just a thought - I'm not a lawyer, so you can safely ignore me > > > (although I am married with a lawyer.. does that help?) > > > rlc > > > >IANALBI

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-04 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > Igor, > > At 06:18 2003-04-04, you wrote: > > >On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > > > > > > Just a thought - I'm not a lawyer, so you can safely ignore me > > > > (although I am marrie

Re: setup.exe final pre-release..

2003-04-04 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 20:42, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > I've been following this discussion from the sidelines for a while.. hope > you don't mind be butting in. Oh, terribly. No gold stars for you. ;]. > On 4 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > > Setup doesn't have a concept of a local mirr