I've uploaded a new setup troubleshooting snapshot:
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3-no-set_default_sec.exe
This is simply 2.340.2.3 with the recently-added ntsec code deactivated.
Please could anyone who can reproduce crashes with 2.340.2.3 give this a
try. If it doesn't cras
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:36:38PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> I've uploaded a new setup troubleshooting snapshot:
> http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3-no-set_default_sec.exe
>
> This is simply 2.340.2.3 with the recently-added ntsec code deactivated.
> Please could anyone who c
Marcel Telka wrote:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:36:38PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
I've uploaded a new setup troubleshooting snapshot:
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3-no-set_default_sec.exe
This is simply 2.340.2.3 with the recently-added ntsec code deactivated.
Please could an
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 04:45:53PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Marcel Telka wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:36:38PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >
> >>I've uploaded a new setup troubleshooting snapshot:
> >>http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3-no-set_default_sec.exe
> >>
> >
Marcel Telka wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 04:45:53PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Great. Same thing, but only half the code disabled:
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.4.exe
Please report back..
Crashes...
Ok, 3/4 disabled...
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 05:26:31PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Marcel Telka wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 04:45:53PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> >>Great. Same thing, but only half the code disabled:
> >>
> >>http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.4.exe
> >>
> >>Please
Marcel Telka wrote:
Ok, 3/4 disabled...
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.5.exe
Crash.
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.6.exe
Cross fingers. This calls no windows API's, just sets a single variable
in memory.
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 05:48:38PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Marcel Telka wrote:
>
> >>Ok, 3/4 disabled...
> >>http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.5.exe
> >
> >
> >Crash.
> >
>
> http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.6.exe
>
> Cross fingers. This calls
Marcel Telka wrote:
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.6.exe
Cross fingers. This calls no windows API's, just sets a single variable
in memory.
Good news: No crash in 1000 runs.
Cool, ok adding the next line of code in, with changes to memory
allocation and use. (Long de
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:24:18PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Lets see how this goes...
> http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.7.exe
crashes.
--
+---+
| Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|homepage: http://
Marcel Telka wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:24:18PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Lets see how this goes...
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.7.exe
crashes.
Can you guess the next version number?
FWIW, this is looking like an MS bug now. If the memory size we pass
into
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:16:45PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Marcel Telka wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:24:18PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> >>Lets see how this goes...
> >>http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3.2.7.exe
> >
> >
> >crashes.
> >
>
> Can you guess the
Marcel Telka wrote:
FWIW, this is looking like an MS bug now. If the memory size we pass
into InitializeAcl causes segfaults, and the memory size is constant
.
Hm. I'm not looking into setup's sources now...
Not asking you too :}.
So, please try .9. I've coded to use the MS documente
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:07:56PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Marcel Telka wrote:
>
> >>FWIW, this is looking like an MS bug now. If the memory size we pass
> >>into InitializeAcl causes segfaults, and the memory size is constant
> >>.
> >
> >
> >Hm. I'm not looking into setup's sour
Marcel Telka wrote:
So, please try .9. I've coded to use the MS documented sizing calculation.
1000 runs, no crash :-)
Fantastic. I'm reinstating all the code now, .10 will be up in ~ 5 mins
and (cross fingers) will also work well...
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubsc
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:38:13PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Marcel Telka wrote:
>
> >>So, please try .9. I've coded to use the MS documented sizing calculation.
> >
> >
> >1000 runs, no crash :-)
>
> Fantastic. I'm reinstating all the code now, .10 will be up in ~ 5 mins
> and (cross finge
Marcel Telka wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:38:13PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Marcel Telka wrote:
So, please try .9. I've coded to use the MS documented sizing calculation.
1000 runs, no crash :-)
Fantastic. I'm reinstating all the code now, .10 will be up in ~ 5 mins
and (cross fingers
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:58:39PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >>Fantastic. I'm reinstating all the code now, .10 will be up in ~ 5 mins
> >>and (cross fingers) will also work well...
> >
> >
> >no crash (1000 runs).
> >
>
> Fantastic. Thank you * very* much for your, oh, 8000 test runs.
Than
Max Bowsher wrote:
I've uploaded a new setup troubleshooting snapshot:
http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.340.2.3-no-set_default_sec.exe
This is simply 2.340.2.3 with the recently-added ntsec code deactivated.
Please could anyone who can reproduce crashes with 2.340.2.3 give this a
try.
Robert Collins wrote:
Fantastic. I'm reinstating all the code now, .10 will be up in ~ 5 mins
and (cross fingers) will also work well...
A final note: this is an MS bug. The MS
InitializeAcl routine appears to have a buffer overrun bug on your OS,
which when combined with a buffer smaller than
D]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: setup.exe troubleshooting snapshot
> Robert Collins wrote:
>
> >
> > Fantastic. I'm reinstating all the code now, .10 will be up in ~ 5 mins
> > and (cross fingers) will also work well...
>
Martin Gainty wrote:
Rob-
How does the unsuspecting public understand what is happening here.
The same way I had to: study the code, eliminate whats occuring, review
the API usage, test, test, test.
Does DrWatson pick this up OR is there something in the logfile
Neither. DrWatson catches the segm
22 matches
Mail list logo
