Larry Hall wrote:
Precisely. The idea of adding to the FAQ for something that should be
obvious goes against my grain but I'm OK with the notion if doing so
addresses a problem. But, at least to me, this one seems way off to one
end of obviousness so I have to question the obvious solution
At 03:03 AM 1/27/2004, Brian Dessent you wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
Precisely. The idea of adding to the FAQ for something that should be
obvious goes against my grain but I'm OK with the notion if doing so
addresses a problem. But, at least to me, this one seems way off to one
end of
At 11:03 AM 1/27/2004, Larry Hall you wrote:
At 03:03 AM 1/27/2004, Brian Dessent you wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
Precisely. The idea of adding to the FAQ for something that should be
obvious goes against my grain but I'm OK with the notion if doing so
addresses a problem. But, at least to me,
Edward W. Rouse
ComSquared Systems, Inc.
Lead Developer, UniSearch Process Optimizer (R)
-Original Message-
At 11:03 AM 1/27/2004, Larry Hall you wrote:
At 03:03 AM 1/27/2004, Brian Dessent you wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
snip
To me, that suggests that we need to either
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Larry Hall wrote:
To me, that suggests that we need to either have a way to optionally
start the configuration of packages from setup.exe and/or somehow queue
the user into the READMEs.
Technically, the FAQ should have accomplished that under Where's the
documentation?.
At 11:25 AM 1/27/2004, Edward W. Rouse you wrote:
-Original Message-
At 11:03 AM 1/27/2004, Larry Hall you wrote:
At 03:03 AM 1/27/2004, Brian Dessent you wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
snip
To me, that suggests that we need to either have a way to optionally
start the
At 11:37 AM 1/27/2004, Brian Ford you wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Larry Hall wrote:
To me, that suggests that we need to either have a way to optionally
start the configuration of packages from setup.exe and/or somehow queue
the user into the READMEs.
Technically, the FAQ should have
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Larry Hall
Otherwise, adding what should be obvious to the FAQ isn't
going to pass muster. The FAQ isn't the place for the obvious.
AYS? The FAQ is the place for _frequently_ asked questions, and I've always
assumed that
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 06:34:29PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Larry Hall
Otherwise, adding what should be obvious to the FAQ isn't going to pass
muster. The FAQ isn't the place for the obvious.
AYS? The FAQ is the place for _frequently_
At 01:41 PM 1/26/2004, Christopher Faylor you wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 06:34:29PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Larry Hall
Otherwise, adding what should be obvious to the FAQ isn't going to pass
muster. The FAQ isn't the place for the
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I actually suspect that this is one of many cases where a FAQ entry
would be of little help and I'm always wary of adding so much verbiage
to the FAQ that it becomes unusable.
I suppose it's the same thought process that prompts people who install
3rd party products
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 11:16:26AM -0800, Shankar Unni wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I actually suspect that this is one of many cases where a FAQ entry
would be of little help and I'm always wary of adding so much verbiage
to the FAQ that it becomes unusable.
I suppose it's the same thought
Hello,
I'm trying to setup sshd and I'm getting to success at all. Here's my
situation. I've followed the instructions at
http://tech.erdelynet.com/cygwin-sshd.html and when I run
*ssh-host-config -y* I get this error message.
To start the service, call `net start sshd' or `cygrunsrv -S
13 matches
Mail list logo
