On 15 Jul, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Incidentally is it appropriate to include Cygwin-port-specific
> > information in a man page?
>
> Well, from a user perspective it might be cool, but IMHO the original
> man page shouldn't be changed, unless it's a change which should be
> send up
On Jul 16 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 15 Jul, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > Incidentally is it appropriate to include Cygwin-port-specific
> > > information in a man page?
> >
> > Well, from a user perspective it might be cool, but IMHO the original
> > man page shouldn't be cha
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 16 12:01, luke.kendallcisra.canon.com.au wrote:
> > On 15 Jul, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > Incidentally is it appropriate to include Cygwin-port-specific
> > > > information in a man page?
> > >
> > > Well, from a user perspective it mig
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:01:03PM +1000, luke.kendall wrote:
> This is a usability issue. It's hard enough to teach people to type:
>
> man
>
> teaching them to type:
>
> more /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/ssmtp-0.x.y/README.ssmtp-0.x.y
I'm partial to:
cygcheck -l ssmtp|fgrep README
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:25:32PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:01:03PM +1000, luke.kendall wrote:
>> This is a usability issue. It's hard enough to teach people to type:
>>
>> man
>>
>> teaching them to type:
>>
>> more /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/ssmt
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:25:32PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:01:03PM +1000, luke.kendall wrote:
> >> This is a usability issue. It's hard enough to teach people to type:
> >>
> >>man
> >>
> >> teaching
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 09:53:44PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:25:32PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>> >On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:01:03PM +1000, luke.kendall wrote:
>> >> This is a usability issue. It's h
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 09:53:44PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:25:32PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > >I'm partial to:
> > >
> > > cygcheck -l ssmtp|fgrep README|xargs less
> > >
> > >myself. Works
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Igor Pechtchanski
> Sent: 16 July 2004 20:12
> > > This is a usability issue. It's hard enough to teach
> people to type:
> > >
> > > man
> > >
> > > teaching them to type:
> > >
> > > more /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/ssmtp-0.x.y/READ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(= Dave K, I believe)
> Another possibility would be for the very last dialog in setup.exe,
> the one that says "download/install complete", to also say in very
> big letters "For Cygwin-specific documentation, see
> /usr/share/doc/Cygwin". It could maybe even have a tic
At 10:51 AM 7/18/2004, you wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>(= Dave K, I believe)
>> Another possibility would be for the very last dialog in setup.exe,
>> the one that says "download/install complete", to also say in very
>> big letters "For Cygwin-specific documentation, see
>> /usr/share/doc/
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Larry Hall
> Sent: 18 July 2004 18:13
> At 10:51 AM 7/18/2004, you wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >(= Dave K, I believe)
> >> Another possibility would be for the very last dialog in
> setup.exe,
> >> the one that says "downlo
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 01:43:18PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>Another possible place to mention the Cygwin-specific READMEs is in the
>>"man cygwin" page. :-)
>
>Another possibility would be for the very last dialog in setup.exe, the
>one that says "download/install complete", to also say in very b
13 matches
Mail list logo
