On Oct 18 17:19, Brian Dessent wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I don't think it's necessary. Since sync is a noop, it doesn't hurt
to call it. I would go a step further. Just omit sync from the
Cygwin release of coreutils.
Perhaps it should be linked to /bin/true on the off chance
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 11:33:09AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 18 17:19, Brian Dessent wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I don't think it's necessary. Since sync is a noop, it doesn't hurt
to call it. I would go a step further. Just omit sync from the
Cygwin release of
On Oct 17 22:43, Reini Urban wrote:
I've taken Mark's coreutils patches, the proposed fileutils patches, and
some of Bas latest patches (ignore errors) and tried to build a package.
Builds fine, just some fixes for setuid processing in make install need
to be done. (for su)
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
On Oct 17 22:43, Reini Urban wrote:
I've taken Mark's coreutils patches, the proposed fileutils patches, and
some of Bas latest patches (ignore errors) and tried to build a package.
Builds fine, just some fixes for setuid processing in make install need
to be done. (for
On Oct 18 14:49, Reini Urban wrote:
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
I would omit su from coreutils. There's no gain to support it in a
windows environment. The functionality is a subset of what a local
sshd installation allows, but with more security implications.
su could check for a local
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I don't think it's necessary. Since sync is a noop, it doesn't hurt
to call it. I would go a step further. Just omit sync from the
Cygwin release of coreutils.
Perhaps it should be linked to /bin/true on the off chance that if some
script wants to call the sync
I've taken Mark's coreutils patches, the proposed fileutils patches, and
some of Bas latest patches (ignore errors) and tried to build a package.
Builds fine, just some fixes for setuid processing in make install need
to be done. (for su)
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/coreutils/
But
7 matches
Mail list logo
