Re: suggest adding posting dates to follows-up and references

2017-02-22 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2017-02-22 14:11, Erik Soderquist wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> It's a reasonable suggestion, and there's no harm in politely >> asking for it. You can include a link to this thread so they can >> see whether the community wants the change. > I'm in

Re: suggest adding posting dates to follows-up and references

2017-02-22 Thread Erik Soderquist
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Andrew Schulman wrote: > It's a reasonable suggestion, and there's no harm in politely asking for > it. You can include a link to this thread so they can see whether the > community wants the change. I'm in agreement, and if it needs a vote, count me in favor of

Re: suggest adding posting dates to follows-up and references

2017-02-22 Thread Andrew Schulman
> > From: Eric Blake > > Still, you'll need to forward this request to webmaster AT sourceware > > DOT org, as the cygwin list readers are not the same people as those in > > charge of maintaining the web pages. (see > > https://sourceware.org/lists.html for the full set of archives that will > >

RE: suggest adding posting dates to follows-up and references

2017-02-22 Thread Nellis, Kenneth (Conduent)
> From: Eric Blake > Still, you'll need to forward this request to webmaster AT sourceware > DOT org, as the cygwin list readers are not the same people as those in > charge of maintaining the web pages. (see > https://sourceware.org/lists.html for the full set of archives that will > be impacted

Re: suggest adding posting dates to follows-up and references

2017-02-22 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/22/2017 11:00 AM, Nellis, Kenneth (Conduent) wrote: > Sorry for leading you astray on the web page, and thank you for drawing my > attention to the MHonArc converter software. Now, I don't know anything > about this software, but looking at >

RE: suggest adding posting dates to follows-up and references

2017-02-22 Thread Nellis, Kenneth (Conduent)
From: Eric Blake [mailto:ebl...@redhat.com] > Well, according to the bottom of > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-02/index.html, the Cygwin mailing list > archives are run by MHonArc software, so it would be a feature request > to MHonArc (https://www.mhonarc.org/) followed by getting the

Re: suggest adding posting dates to follows-up and references

2017-02-22 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/22/2017 10:31 AM, Nellis, Kenneth (Conduent) wrote: > No, I'm not using webmail. I am using browser to read postings directly > from http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin. (I copied from the web page, > then pasted and did a bit of editing to get the bullets to render > somewhat before posting. Maybe

RE: suggest adding posting dates to follows-up and references

2017-02-22 Thread Nellis, Kenneth (Conduent)
From: Eric Blake > On 02/22/2017 08:27 AM, Nellis, Kenneth (Conduent) wrote: > > FWIW, here's a change that I would find beneficial: > > > > At the bottom of a post, which is either a reply and/or has a follow-up, > > we see something like the following example: > > > > • Follow-Ups: > > I'm

Re: suggest adding posting dates to follows-up and references

2017-02-22 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/22/2017 08:27 AM, Nellis, Kenneth (Conduent) wrote: > FWIW, here's a change that I would find beneficial: > > At the bottom of a post, which is either a reply and/or has a follow-up, > we see something like the following example: > > • Follow-Ups: I'm guessing that you are using a

suggest adding posting dates to follows-up and references

2017-02-22 Thread Nellis, Kenneth (Conduent)
FWIW, here's a change that I would find beneficial: At the bottom of a post, which is either a reply and/or has a follow-up, we see something like the following example: • Follow-Ups: ◦ Re: Hangs on connect to UNIX socket being listened on in the same process (was: Cygwin hanging in