On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:14 PM, David Rothenberger wrote:
...
I no longer use Subversion, having switched to git,
Heretic!
(: Csaba :)
--
GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Life is complex,
On 07/01/2015 18:14, David Rothenberger wrote:
On 1/7/2015 7:18 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
/usr/bin/svn-bisect is not in the current release of subversion-tools,
but it's in the previous release. Is this a packaging oversight or a
deliberate decision?
It was an explicit decision by me, the package
On 1/7/2015 7:18 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
/usr/bin/svn-bisect is not in the current release of subversion-tools,
but it's in the previous release. Is this a packaging oversight or a
deliberate decision?
It was an explicit decision by me, the package maintainer. The 1.7
release series had an
/usr/bin/svn-bisect is not in the current release of subversion-tools, but it's
in the previous release. Is this a packaging oversight or a deliberate decision?
Ken
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:
4 matches
Mail list logo
