On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 08:21 -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> On 05/07/2011 8:10 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jul 4 12:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Jul 4 11:15, Wolf Geldmacher wrote:
> >>> As an aside:
> >>> I also used to have some trouble with "rm -rf" of a directory
> >>> hierarch
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 14:10 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 4 12:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jul 4 11:15, Wolf Geldmacher wrote:
> > > As an aside:
> > > I also used to have some trouble with "rm -rf" of a directory
> > > hierarchy failing more or less reproducibly (like: 80% o
On 05/07/2011 8:10 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 4 12:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 4 11:15, Wolf Geldmacher wrote:
As an aside:
I also used to have some trouble with "rm -rf" of a directory
hierarchy failing more or less reproducibly (like: 80% of the
time)
On Jul 4 16:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 4 08:21, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> > However, I was wrong about not seeing the problem since. Choosing a
> > random source dir to blow away:
> > >$ rm -rf Python-2.6.6
> > >rm: cannot remove `Python-2.6.6/Lib/lib2to3/tests': Directory not empty
> > >$
On Jul 4 12:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 4 11:15, Wolf Geldmacher wrote:
> > As an aside:
> > I also used to have some trouble with "rm -rf" of a directory
> > hierarchy failing more or less reproducibly (like: 80% of the
> > time) because files were presumably still "in use".
> Any idea of how to debug this? We need some instantaneous version of
> lsof or something...
Not what you asked for, but useful for debugging stuff like this: FileMon and
ProcessMonitor from Sysinternals.com (now a MS site). Just in case you haven't
run across them before...
..mark
--
Proble
On Jul 4 16:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 4 08:21, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> > However, I was wrong about not seeing the problem since. Choosing a
> > random source dir to blow away:
> > >$ rm -rf Python-2.6.6
> > >rm: cannot remove `Python-2.6.6/Lib/lib2to3/tests': Directory not empty
> > >$
On 04/07/2011 8:21 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 04/07/2011 7:33 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 4 06:56, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 04/07/2011 6:46 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 4 11:15, Wolf Geldmacher wrote:
As an aside:
I also used to have some trouble with "rm -rf" of a directory
On Jul 4 08:21, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> However, I was wrong about not seeing the problem since. Choosing a
> random source dir to blow away:
> >$ rm -rf Python-2.6.6
> >rm: cannot remove `Python-2.6.6/Lib/lib2to3/tests': Directory not empty
> >$ rm -rf Python-2.6.6
> >$
>
> This seems to happen mo
On 04/07/2011 7:33 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 4 06:56, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 04/07/2011 6:46 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 4 11:15, Wolf Geldmacher wrote:
As an aside:
I also used to have some trouble with "rm -rf" of a directory
hierarchy failing more or less r
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 13:33 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 4 06:56, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> > On 04/07/2011 6:46 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >On Jul 4 11:15, Wolf Geldmacher wrote:
> > >>As an aside:
> > >> I also used to have some trouble with "rm -rf" of a directory
> > >> hierarch
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 12:46 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 4 11:15, Wolf Geldmacher wrote:
> > As an aside:
> > I also used to have some trouble with "rm -rf" of a directory
> > hierarchy failing more or less reproducibly (like: 80% of the
> > time) because files were presumab
On Jul 4 13:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 4 06:56, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> > I have also seen the rm -rf problem occasionally on my w7-64
> > machine, and I don't think anything from BLODA is installed.
>
> Also with 1.7.8? Given the minor number of FS-related changes, it's
> so very unlik
On Jul 4 06:56, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> On 04/07/2011 6:46 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Jul 4 11:15, Wolf Geldmacher wrote:
> >>As an aside:
> >>I also used to have some trouble with "rm -rf" of a directory
> >>hierarchy failing more or less reproducibly (like: 80% of the
> >>time)
On 04/07/2011 6:46 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 4 11:15, Wolf Geldmacher wrote:
As an aside:
I also used to have some trouble with "rm -rf" of a directory
hierarchy failing more or less reproducibly (like: 80% of the
time) because files were presumably still "in us
On Jul 4 11:15, Wolf Geldmacher wrote:
> As an aside:
> I also used to have some trouble with "rm -rf" of a directory
> hierarchy failing more or less reproducibly (like: 80% of the
> time) because files were presumably still "in use". Repeating
> the command several times
As an aside:
I also used to have some trouble with "rm -rf" of a directory
hierarchy failing more or less reproducibly (like: 80% of the
time) because files were presumably still "in use". Repeating
the command several times would succeed, though.
Downgradin
17 matches
Mail list logo
