On Dec 23 01:17, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hans Horn wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I think Gerrit qualifies as a hardcore cygwin guru.
I did think so!
I guess there are many levels of hardcore cygwin guru'ness.
now what about libfetish
It was not included with the fileutils
Group,
can somebody tell me where the objects for the dirname and basename
functions have gone?
Way back when (say summer 2003) both lived in libfetish.a.
Currently (since summer 2004) I can find only basename (in libiberty.a).
thx,
H.
p.s.
the timestamps on the two libraries on my system are
Hans Horn wrote:
Group,
can somebody tell me where the objects for the dirname and basename
functions have gone?
Way back when (say summer 2003) both lived in libfetish.a.
Currently (since summer 2004) I can find only basename (in libiberty.a).
What is libfetish, never heard this name?
I have
Hallo Gerrit,
libfetish.a seems to be related to GNU coreutils (google on it).
Maybe one of the hardcore cygwin gurus could shed a light on this?
In the meantime I have helped myself lifting the dirname source (actually
it's dir_name) from the new cygwin coreutils package.
thx,
H.
Gerrit P.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 02:15:28PM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
libfetish.a seems to be related to GNU coreutils (google on it). Maybe
one of the hardcore cygwin gurus could shed a light on this?
I think Gerrit qualifies as a hardcore cygwin guru.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 02:15:28PM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
libfetish.a seems to be related to GNU coreutils (google on it).
Maybe one of the hardcore cygwin gurus could shed a light on this?
I think Gerrit qualifies as a hardcore cygwin guru.
I did think so!
I
Hans Horn wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 02:15:28PM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
libfetish.a seems to be related to GNU coreutils (google on it).
Maybe one of the hardcore cygwin gurus could shed a light on this?
I think Gerrit qualifies as a hardcore cygwin guru.
I did think
7 matches
Mail list logo