Talking to Tim Waugh, the author of xmlto, revealed that the order of
arguments doesn't matter on his system (that's Red Hat, I guess),
whereas it matters indeed on Cygwin.
Investigating it a bit further revealed that Cygwin's getopt differs
from what he expected:
getopt -- o: xmlto -o foo bar
Patrick Eisenacher wrote:
> Talking to Tim Waugh, the author of xmlto, revealed that the order of
> arguments doesn't matter on his system (that's Red Hat, I guess),
> whereas it matters indeed on Cygwin.
>
> Investigating it a bit further revealed that Cygwin's getopt differs
> from what he expect
Hi Patrick.
On 2003.08.02 11:57, Patrick Eisenacher wrote:
Hi,
my Cygwin xmlto installation (v0.0.14) is missing all the fo formats
(dvi, pdf, ps) in /usr/share/xmlto/format/docbook, and the fo
subfolder is missing from the /usr/share/xmlto/format/ directory
completely. Without those files xml
Ok, glad to hear I'm not the only one with this behaviour. That leads to
the question why they were removed in the first place. Marcel, how about
putting them back into the distribution?
Copying the missing pdf files from the source tarball into the
installation directory lets xmlto access an insta
Hallo Patrick,
Am Samstag, 2. August 2003 um 11:57 schriebst du:
> Hi,
> my Cygwin xmlto installation (v0.0.14) is missing all the fo formats
> (dvi, pdf, ps) in /usr/share/xmlto/format/docbook, and the fo subfolder
> is missing from the /usr/share/xmlto/format/ directory completely.
> Withou
Hi,
my Cygwin xmlto installation (v0.0.14) is missing all the fo formats
(dvi, pdf, ps) in /usr/share/xmlto/format/docbook, and the fo subfolder
is missing from the /usr/share/xmlto/format/ directory completely.
Without those files xmlto is unable to create the corresponding target
document fo
6 matches
Mail list logo
