At 22.08.01 02:19 , you wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 01:31:39AM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> > At 22.08.01 00:37 , you wrote:
> > >
> > >Those 2 regions follow each other. I think you're not supposed
> > >to merge those regions even if you could.
> > >
> > >If you don't merge regions i
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 01:31:39AM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> At 22.08.01 00:37 , you wrote:
> >
> >Those 2 regions follow each other. I think you're not supposed
> >to merge those regions even if you could.
> >
> >If you don't merge regions in any other case, why would you
> >suddenly
At 22.08.01 00:37 , you wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 12:11:02AM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> > At 21.08.01 12:11 , you wrote:
> > >On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:55:54PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> > > > At 20.08.01 13:18 , you wrote:
> > > > >On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:06:13PM +02
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 12:11:02AM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> At 21.08.01 12:11 , you wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:55:54PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> > > At 20.08.01 13:18 , you wrote:
> > > >On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:06:13PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> > >
>
At 21.08.01 12:11 , you wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:55:54PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> > At 20.08.01 13:18 , you wrote:
> > >On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:06:13PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> >
> > And locks outside of upgraded regions are resized to fit and kept as standalo
I'm joining this late, and may be misunderstanding
something, but...
On 20 August 2001 at 23:25, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:55:54PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> > >On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:06:13PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
>> Example:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:55:54PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> At 20.08.01 13:18 , you wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:06:13PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
>
> And locks outside of upgraded regions are resized to fit and kept as standalone
>locks?
>
> Example:
> A file has w
At 20.08.01 23:25 , you wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:55:54PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> > At 20.08.01 13:18 , you wrote:
> > >On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:06:13PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> > >
> > > There will be at most one type of lock set for each byte in the
> > >
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:55:54PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> At 20.08.01 13:18 , you wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:06:13PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> >
> > There will be at most one type of lock set for each byte in the
> > file. Before a successful return fro
At 20.08.01 13:18 , you wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:06:13PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
> > Issue 2:
> > Affects: Uniprocess, fcntl->F_SETLK->F_RDLCK/F_WRLCK/F_UNLCK
> >
> > Both win32 and posix allow only one type of lock per byte of a file.
> >
> > Win32 fails if any region overl
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:06:13PM +0200, Gunnar Andre Dalsnes wrote:
>
> Issue 1:
> Affects: Uniprocess, CloseHandle (file)
>
> Both win32 and posix discharges locks made by process when ends.
>
> Win32 associate locks with handles.
> If one of many handles for a file close, only locks made b
11 matches
Mail list logo