Hi,
Just wondering if anyone out there's using Fetchmail...?
I want to use it in conjunction with an IMAP server and procmail, but
it seems that a local SMTP server is required for this. What is being
used for this?
Thanks
David
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubs
Subject: Re: Fetchmail as a service
I followed the instructions given recently in this forum on how to
install
fetchmail as a service (fetchmail is running fine in the background):
* Jason Tishler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010925 03:26]:
>
>
> 2. I needed to (re)define the HOME
I followed the instructions given recently in this forum on how to install
fetchmail as a service (fetchmail is running fine in the background):
* Jason Tishler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010925 03:26]:
>
>
> 2. I needed to (re)define the HOME variable when I installed fetchmail
Well, it would appear all is working well now.
I now have procmail working and delivering my mail. I had originally tried a perl
script, spoolmail.pl, which I think was causing me some heartache. And, I have
fetchmail running as a service.
I think this will be a decent setup. It would be nice
Gerrit,
David,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 01:09:36PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> > David Monk schrieb am 2001-09-24 12:53:
>
> >I have just started trying to use fetchmail on cygwin. We have no MTA or MDA
> >in cygwin, so how would one use fetchmail?
As Gerrit has mentio
Very good, Jason. I have it set up that way, too.
David, you asked if anyone was running fetchmail. The answer was easy:
Yes. And as a service. That did answer your question.
I am running fetchmail very much like Jason described. I'm not having
any problems mentioned in the archive
> Norman Vine schrieb am 2001-09-25 7:57:
>Gerrit P. Haase writes:
>>
>>> David Monk schrieb am 2001-09-24 12:53:
>> I have not been able to get
>>>fetchmailconf to work. It says python was probably not
>>configured for Tk.
>>
>>Python should have tk included.
>
>>It works great on cygwin. I
> David Monk schrieb am 2001-09-24 12:53:
>I have just started trying to use fetchmail on cygwin. We have no MTA or MDA
>in cygwin, so how would one use fetchmail? I couldn't find anything on the
>fetchmail site except that now that they had SMTP forwarding code working,
&g
David,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 03:15:51PM -0500, David Monk wrote:
> There was a message in the archive regarding running fetchmail as a service
> via cygwin. But, the only thing in the message was "Yes. I have it running.
> And as a service" basically.
> Has anyone han
There was a message in the archive regarding running fetchmail as a service
via cygwin. But, the only thing in the message was "Yes. I have it running.
And as a service" basically.
Has anyone hanging around and paying attention to the list got fetchmail
running as a service? If so,
Dave,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:55:27PM -0400, dave wrote:
> Does anyone have fetchmail working on cygwin?
Yes, fetchmail builds OOTB but caused me grief when I switched from NT 4.0
to 2000 due to mail corruption. See the following for details and patch:
http://sources.redhat.com
Yes. As a service, even.
-ME
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of dave
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fetchmail.
Hello,
Does anyone have fetchmail working on cygwin?
Thanks.
Dave
Hello,
Does anyone have fetchmail working on cygwin?
Thanks.
Dave.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
receive side.
I believe that I have finally found the root cause to my transient
fetchmail corruption problems under Windows 2000. From the following
MSDN articles, it appears the Winsock's recv/WSARecv(..., MSG_PEEK)
is inherently unreliable and strongly discouraged:
http://support.mi
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:42:41PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Am 7 Aug 2001, um 16:10 hat Jason Tishler geschrieben:
>
> Jason,
>
> > [This message was received corrupted... I have attached it for
> > perusal by the curious.]
>
> Some more comments:
>
> I just send a binary to myself via
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 09:26:03PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Olaf could you please report exactely what you do to send out a
> corrupt message? Is it a known issue? I never heard before of
> problems with mailing through ssmtp on win2k.
> I will try tomorrow to send some mail with ssmtp an
1 machines using mutt via ssmtp. The message arrives
to my ISP's POP server uncorrupted. If I retrieve it with mutt directly,
then it remains uncorrupted. If I retrieve it with fetchmail on either
of my two 2000 SP1 machines, then it gets corrupted about 50% - 70%
of the times. If I r
Am 7 Aug 2001, um 16:10 hat Jason Tishler geschrieben:
Jason,
> [This message was received corrupted... I have attached it for
> perusal by the curious.]
Some more comments:
I just send a binary to myself via mutt from the commandline here at
my win98 box:
$ mutt -a 037.jpg -s test [EMAIL P
>
> Note the null character above, this is part of the corruption.
>
> If I send the same message (which includes an attachment) to myself
> repeatedly, most of the time to it is corrupted when fetched via POP
> by fetchmail.
And for this test sendings you used ssmtp?
Plus mutt?
B
to it is corrupted when fetched via POP by
fetchmail.
> Sorry, I don't know enough to help you out of this misere since i
> never used procmail, but io have some more questions.
Thanks for the sympathy and yes, this is misery!
> Jason, do you use also use ssmtp as Olaf mentioned?
Y
allowed some latitude...]
> >
> > I am using fetchmail/procmail/mutt to retrieve, process, and read my
> > email. I recently changed from using a Windows NT 4.0 SP5 to a
> > Windows 2000 SP1 machine. Shortly thereafter, I started to notice
> > that some of the
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 11:31:10AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
> [I normally would not post such a vague bug report but since this problem
> significantly impacts my mail delivery I hope that I will be allowed some
> latitude...]
>
> I am using fetchmail/procmail/mutt to retriev
[I normally would not post such a vague bug report but since this problem
significantly impacts my mail delivery I hope that I will be allowed some
latitude...]
I am using fetchmail/procmail/mutt to retrieve, process, and read my
email. I recently changed from using a Windows NT 4.0 SP5 to a
> Hi,
> > >
> > > i got a binary here (313kb)
> > > http://familiehaase.de/fetchmail-5.8.1-1.tar.bz2
> > >
> > > $ fetchmail --version
> > > This is fetchmail release 5.8.1+SSL
> > > CYGWIN_NT-4.0 ISMENE 1.3.2(0.39/3/2) 2001-05-20
> >
By the way, is the binary for NT only. I'm using
win98.
--- "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ªº¶l¥ó¤º®e¡G>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 2001-07-05 19:51:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > i got a binary here (313kb)
> > http://familiehaase.de/fe
Thanks.
I did tried to compile the fetchmail 5.8.0 myself
before posting to mailing list. But I failed. I'm not
expert in gcc or cc. Here is the first error found in
the config.log:
=
...
...
configure:1278: checking for AIX
configure:1302: checkin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 2001-07-05 19:51:
> Hi,
>
> i got a binary here (313kb)
> http://familiehaase.de/fetchmail-5.8.1-1.tar.bz2
>
> $ fetchmail --version
> This is fetchmail release 5.8.1+SSL
> CYGWIN_NT-4.0 ISMENE 1.3.2(0.39/3/2) 2001-05-20 23:28 i686 un
Hi,
i got a binary here (313kb)
http://familiehaase.de/fetchmail-5.8.1-1.tar.bz2
$ fetchmail --version
This is fetchmail release 5.8.1+SSL
CYGWIN_NT-4.0 ISMENE 1.3.2(0.39/3/2) 2001-05-20 23:28 i686 unknown
Taking options from command line
No mailservers set up -- perhaps ~/.fetchmailrc is
Sam,
Fetchmail is not included, however, it builds cleanly out of the box,
if I recall correctly.
-ME
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sam C.
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 6:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fetchmail in cygwin
Is fetchmail included in cygwin package ?
Or, is there any fetchmail.exe binary ?
_
Do You Yahoo!?
«Ø¥ßÓ¤Hºô¯¸ http://geocities.yahoo.com.hk
Build your own website at http://geocities.yahoo.com.hk
--
Unsubscribe info: http
Hello,
I've just created a web page where you can obtain pre-compiled binaries
of fetchmail and procmail.
Currently, I have no intention to become a maintainer for the Cygwin
versions of these software: I simply lack experiences to do such a job.
This is a personal (and amateurish) attem
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Walter Garcia-Fontes wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to compile fetchmail, which according to recent messages
> compiles OOTB under Cygwin. But my compilation aborts. I attach some
> info on the place where it stops, and my cygcheck in case anybody
> can hel
Hi,
I'm trying to compile fetchmail, which according to recent messages
compiles OOTB under Cygwin. But my compilation aborts. I attach some
info on the place where it stops, and my cygcheck in case anybody
can help:
gcc rcfile_y.o rcfile_l.o socket.o getpass.o pop2.o pop3.o imap.o
etrn.o
st the gettext static library (libintl.a) that is
> distributed as part of fetchmail source tarball. Because so many
> projects include gettext within their own code (a BAD practice, IMO),
> fixing this The Right Way is hard.
>
> The easy way:
> Add -DGETTEXT_STATIC to your CFLAGS b
"Jari Aalto+tpu.misc" wrote:
>
> Would anyone have clue what is this missing _imp__gettext ?
>
> Jari
You are compiling with the gettext header files in /usr/include, but are
linking against the gettext static library (libintl.a) that is
distributed as part of fe
o smbmd4.o smbutil.o
ipv6-connect.o lock.o md5c.o -lcrypt -lfl -o fetchmail
rcfile_y.o(.text+0x12c5):rcfile_y.c: undefined reference to `_imp__gettext'
rcfile_y.o(.text+0x1448):rcfile_y.c: undefined reference to `_imp__gettext'
rcfile_y.o(.text+0x1581):rcfile_y.c: undefined referen
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:55:51AM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote:
> Hmm. Isn't there a way to figure this out using a UNIX API? Could
> we extend pathconf, maybe?
Yup. That makes sense.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 02:53:11PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 08:33:26AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >
>> > In theory that should be no problem. As a first hack simply
>> > uncomment these calls or ignore the return value. If maildrop
>> >
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 08:33:26AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > In theory that should be no problem. As a first hack simply
> > uncomment these calls or ignore the return value. If maildrop
> > uses strict chmod settings, open them up. If maildrop then works
> > wit
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> In theory that should be no problem. As a first hack simply
> uncomment these calls or ignore the return value. If maildrop
> uses strict chmod settings, open them up. If maildrop then works
> without complaining we could care to rearranging security again.
> I have wr
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:52:25AM +0900, Rue. SATOH wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen:
> > Did it build OOTB or did you patch it somehow?
> >
> > That sounds interesting. Together with ssmtp and fetchmail with -mda
> > option we would have a full mailing system.
>
>
Corinna Vinschen:
> Did it build OOTB or did you patch it somehow?
>
> That sounds interesting. Together with ssmtp and fetchmail with -mda
> option we would have a full mailing system.
I'll send a patch for maildrop to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But this patch is *dirty*.
Maildrop us
01031149> Thank you for the URL to your maildrop binary. Unfortunately, I'm a
01031149> newbie to Unix, and I don't know how to use RPM -- heck I don't even know
01031149> what it means and what it does. My only exposure to Unix so far has been
01031149> 3 months on FreeBSD, and 2 weeks on Cygwin.
Duke Normandin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess the subject line says it all ;,)
> I guess that I can do w/o fetchmail -- but would like to use procmail or
> a clone thereof. Also, I'd like to try out jed (using Joe right now), but
> only saw a B-20 incarnation. Wo
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Malcolm Boekhoff wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Enoch wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Mutt's regular expression and folder-hook is very powerful - almost like procmail
>functionality. I can drop mails into various
> folders.
>
> How? I'm sure I'm not alone in trying to get this to wor
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 03:23:11PM -0700, Duke Normandin wrote:
> > I guess the subject line says it all ;,)
> > I guess that I can do w/o fetchmail -- but would like to use procmail or
> > a clone thereof. Also, I'd like to try out jed (using Joe right now), but
>
t build OOTB or did you patch it somehow?
That sounds interesting. Together with ssmtp and fetchmail with -mda
option we would have a full mailing system.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[E
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 03:23:11PM -0700, Duke Normandin wrote:
> I guess the subject line says it all ;,)
> I guess that I can do w/o fetchmail -- but would like to use procmail or
> a clone thereof. Also, I'd like to try out jed (using Joe right now), but
> only saw a B-20 i
01031149> I guess the subject line says it all ;,)
01031149> I guess that I can do w/o fetchmail -- but would like to use procmail or
01031149> a clone thereof. Also, I'd like to try out jed (using Joe right now), but
01031149> only saw a B-20 incarnation. Would this version
Fetchmail is easy, go to the web page (search for it if you have to),
download it, extract it and run ./configure; make; make install.
With the others, I don't know.
-ME
- Original Message -
From: "Duke Normandin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cygwin List
I guess the subject line says it all ;,)
I guess that I can do w/o fetchmail -- but would like to use procmail or
a clone thereof. Also, I'd like to try out jed (using Joe right now), but
only saw a B-20 incarnation. Would this version of Jed work on my recent
cygwin install? Tia...
--
> Use macro like this:
>
> macro index ':set spoolfile=+popfolder^m:set spoolfile=$MAIL^m'
I currently have "set spoolfile=+pop3.demon.co.uk" (~/.muttrc) and I use the "G"
command to retrieve the mail. This is what the
first two commands in your macro do. Are you suggesting that I set the spool
Please ignore this posting as I have stupidly left in the "-E" switch!
- Original Message -
From: "Malcolm Boekhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cygwin News Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: Fetchmail i
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:50:11AM -, Malcolm Boekhoff wrote:
> > The symbol "unsetenv" is declared in "/usr/include/stdlib.h" and is defined in
> >
> > /usr/lib/libc.a
> > /usr/lib/libcygwin.a
> > /usr/lib/libg.a
> > /usr/lib/libm.a
> >
> > The question is: "Which one of the
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:50:11AM -, Malcolm Boekhoff wrote:
> The symbol "unsetenv" is declared in "/usr/include/stdlib.h" and is defined in
>
> /usr/lib/libc.a
> /usr/lib/libcygwin.a
> /usr/lib/libg.a
> /usr/lib/libm.a
>
> The question is: "Which one of these libraries sho
Earnie Boyd wrote:
>
> Malcolm Boekhoff wrote:
> >
> > The symbol "unsetenv" is declared in "/usr/include/stdlib.h" and is defined in
> >
> > /usr/lib/libc.a
> > /usr/lib/libcygwin.a
> > /usr/lib/libg.a
> > /usr/lib/libm.a
> >
> > The question is: "Which one of these libraries sho
Malcolm Boekhoff wrote:
>
> The symbol "unsetenv" is declared in "/usr/include/stdlib.h" and is defined in
>
> /usr/lib/libc.a
> /usr/lib/libcygwin.a
> /usr/lib/libg.a
> /usr/lib/libm.a
>
> The question is: "Which one of these libraries should I be linking to?".
>
You should h
The symbol "unsetenv" is declared in "/usr/include/stdlib.h" and is defined in
/usr/lib/libc.a
/usr/lib/libcygwin.a
/usr/lib/libg.a
/usr/lib/libm.a
The question is: "Which one of these libraries should I be linking to?".
> > A Question to the Cygwin Porters Knowledge Base Egghea
> "Charles" == Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>> Volker,
>>
>> why are you sending each message twice???
>>
Charles> Twice? I got eight copies. I figure Volker's mailer is foobared.
I got 16 copies. Hopefully I
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> Volker,
>
> why are you sending each message twice???
>
Twice? I got eight copies. I figure Volker's mailer is foobared.
--Chuck
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Volker,
why are you sending each message twice???
Corinna
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 05:40:30PM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> > "Charles" == Charles S Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Charles> I know I had to do some hacking on db-2.7.7 to create the build at
> Charles> cyguti
> "Charles" == Charles S Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> I know I had to do some hacking on db-2.7.7 to create the build at
Charles> cygutils -- are you using the cygutils db? Anyway, I know that Michael
I was using my own db-2.7.7 build.
Ciao
Volker
--
Want to unsub
> "Charles" == Charles S Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> I know I had to do some hacking on db-2.7.7 to create the build at
Charles> cygutils -- are you using the cygutils db? Anyway, I know that Michael
I was using my own db-2.7.7 build.
Ciao
Volker
--
Want to unsub
> "Charles" == Charles S Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> I know I had to do some hacking on db-2.7.7 to create the build at
Charles> cygutils -- are you using the cygutils db? Anyway, I know that Michael
I was using my own db-2.7.7 build.
Ciao
Volker
--
Want to unsub
> o sendmail-8.11.1 - http://www.sendmail.org/
>
> compiles (see patch below) . I'm using
>
> o db-3.1.17 - http://www.sleepycat.com/
>
> There seems to be a problem with my version of libdb.a. When I try sendmail -bi
> to create the alias file I get Permission denied.
> sendmail gives: Canno
> "Corinna" == Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Corinna> Uhm, ok, what next? I see the files but no further description.
Corinna> Corinna
Hi Corinna
Strange, see below for the text which was in my previous mail. Somehow, my GNUS
screwed up
my mail because of the attachm
Uhm, ok, what next? I see the files but no further description.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cy
diff -upr /gnu/sendmail-8.11.1/cf/cf/Makefile sendmail-8.11.1/cf/cf/Makefile
--- /gnu/sendmail-8.11.1/cf/cf/Makefile Wed Aug 9 18:14:39 2000
+++ sendmail-8.11.1/cf/cf/Makefile Sun Dec 31 15:47:28 2000
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ RM= rm -f
$(CHMOD) $(ROMODE) $@
GENERIC=generic-bsd4.4.cf generic-hpux9.c
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 08:57:16AM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> > "Kevin" == Kevin Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Kevin> Corinna,
> Kevin> I've compiled sendmail in the past. It wasn't easy and after I
> Kevin> compiled it, I didn't know what to do with it :-) I have no
> "Kevin" == Kevin Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> Corinna,
Kevin> I've compiled sendmail in the past. It wasn't easy and after I
Kevin> compiled it, I didn't know what to do with it :-) I have no
Kevin> experience using sendmail and it's not the most user-friendly
pertise in this area.
--Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 7:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Fetchmail is available on Cygwin
>
>
> On We
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 03:36:33PM -, Malcolm Boekhoff wrote:
>
> A Question to the Cygwin Porters Knowledge Base Eggheads
>
>
> Regarding the compilation of sendmail, which one of these OS's (from
>sendmail/devtools/os directory) is
>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: Fetchmail is available on Cygwin
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:39:54AM -0500, David Bush wrote:
> > I found a reference to this on the gnu.emacs.vm.info newsgroup.
> >
> > http://unixmail-w32.sourceforge.net/
>
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:39:54AM -0500, David Bush wrote:
> I found a reference to this on the gnu.emacs.vm.info newsgroup.
>
> http://unixmail-w32.sourceforge.net/
>
> Fetchmail, mutt, sSMTP, a/pspell, and GnuPG. Requires Cygwin to run.
mutt is in the base distro, ssmtp too
I found a reference to this on the gnu.emacs.vm.info newsgroup.
http://unixmail-w32.sourceforge.net/
Fetchmail, mutt, sSMTP, a/pspell, and GnuPG. Requires Cygwin to run.
Perhaps, Not as facinating as LINE, but useful.
david
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http
I need to get some docs on using "ssmtp". Anybody know where there is
some. 'man' and 'info' didn't turn up anything.
Have procmail and fetchmail been ported to the "cygwin" environment? If
so, where are they? Tia...
--
-duke
Calgary, Alberta, Ca
Malcolm Boekhoff wrote:
>
> I got fetchmail working by setting the "ntea" option in CYGWIN environment variable
>and then chmodding ~/.fetchmailrc.
Not on 9X.
> > "Julia A . Case" wrote:
> > > change the permissions, is there a way under win
I got fetchmail working by setting the "ntea" option in CYGWIN environment variable
and then chmodding ~/.fetchmailrc.
> "Julia A . Case" wrote:
> > I downloaded the source to fetchmail and it compiled out of the box. But
> > when I went to run it, it com
"Julia A . Case" wrote:
> I downloaded the source to fetchmail and it compiled out of the box. But
> when I went to run it, it complained that .fetchmailrc must have the
> permissions of 0710... I tried chmod 0710 .fetchmailrc but that didn't
> change the permissions,
I downloaded the source to fetchmail and it compiled out of the box. But
when I went to run it, it complained that .fetchmailrc must have the
permissions of 0710... I tried chmod 0710 .fetchmailrc but that didn't
change the permissions, is there a way under win98 to change the
permis
80 matches
Mail list logo
