Re: renaming the package. Don't do this *yet*.
a) there is no urgency in doing so,
b) setup can't help at this point, and using ncurses as a reference
point, it could have been worse, and ncurses has _no_ knobs to twiddle
and get wrong, which tex* does AFAIK.
setup will be able to help, probably
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Any opinions on this topic ?
Btw one thing - I've found many #include strings.h in
the latest sources - shouldn't this be changed to #include
string.h ? mingw doesnt have strings.h. Btw It seems that
if you have string.h you dont need strings.h (I'm under
Earnie Boyd wrote:
Yes but it gives various include paths from cygwin build and newlib
build -
this means that you compile only in this environment (i.e. winsup env).
If you
try only mingw it wont work :)
However I've fixed that for me locally
There should be nothing to fix.
egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Wednesday, 05 December, 2001 Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SUSv2 mandates both strings.h and string.h
mingw declares strcasecmp() in string.h while SUSv2 says it should
be in strings.h
Afaik str[n]case is and BSD-ism :)
Btw here is what glibc on redhat
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem with make
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 08:14:04PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original
===
- Original Message -
From: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Wednesday, 05 December, 2001 Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SUSv2 mandates both strings.h and string.h
Wrong documentation base. You must use MSDN for MinGW.
mingw declares
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 03:39:38PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Wednesday, 05 December, 2001 Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PT egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Wednesday, 05 December, 2001 Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SUSv2 mandates both strings.h and string.h
mingw declares
egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Wednesday, 05 December, 2001 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB egor duda wrote:
Wednesday, 05 December, 2001 Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SUSv2 mandates both strings.h and string.h
EB Wrong documentation base. You must use MSDN for MinGW.
Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keeping backward compatible/useable behaviour for
a) Local installs from directories without setup.ini files, and
That user must deal with those themselves.
Nice in theory. If that was truely
- Original Message -
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How long would it take to phase them out? A fresh setup.ini that
doesn't mention tetex-beta would make tetex-beta invisible? Hmm, but
then we'd need a 'conflicts:' setup hint or so, and locally cached
setup.ini's could
Yep :].
ok, convinced me, I'll be re-packaging today.
OpenBSD also does this. IMO it's the best way for apache because
a) /var is appropriate for user modified data files for applications,
and
b) www is easily associated with apache, AND can be reused if apache is
removed and (pick
Chuck,
Misc as a category acts like base: things in it always install.
I guess this isn't documented clearly anywhere except the cygdev
archives, so I'll correct that soon.
Can I suggest that the cygutils packages belongs in (shock horror) Utils
?
Rob
Robert Collins wrote:
Chuck,
Misc as a category acts like base: things in it always install.
Uhm, why? I missed this conversation evidently. IMNSHO, Base should be
the only required install. Misc are niceties that make the job easier
but aren't required.
I guess this isn't
13 matches
Mail list logo
