Hallo Mark,
2001-12-07 09:31:41, du schriebst:
> I would be interested in being a package maintainer for GNU whois (and maybe
> dig and host down the road). Any interest in such?
Yes I'm interested;)
Which whois do you want to maintain?
http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/jwhois.html
http:/
Hallo,
I am sure that this was discussed, I didn't searched the archives, but
I want to make this request (again if it is so):
Change the default mount behaviour to create binmode user mounts
if called without options.
Example:
$ mount C:/some/drive /mydrive
should create a binmode user mount vs
Hi all,
I'm interested in being the package maintainer for figlet. The latest
version is 2.2 and was released in 1996 (and so I can't realistically see it
being updated again). I have already compiled the source and created a
tar.bz2 of the binaries/docs/etc and I've created what I /think/ is a
"Gerrit P. Haase" wrote:
>
> Hallo,
>
> I am sure that this was discussed, I didn't searched the archives, but
> I want to make this request (again if it is so):
>
> Change the default mount behaviour to create binmode user mounts
> if called without options.
> Example:
> $ mount C:/some/drive
> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:55:02 +0100
> From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Which whois do you want to maintain?
> http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/jwhois.html
> http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/whois.html
Don't forget bw-whois, which is my favorite: http://whois.bw.
Hallo Jonathan,
2001-12-07 16:22:05, du schriebst:
>> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:55:02 +0100
>> From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Which whois do you want to maintain?
>> http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/jwhois.html
>> http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/whois.html
>
Hi,
Some people promised to have a look at my cross build scripts package
so I've made some fixes. It should generate fully Cygwin compliant
binary and source packages now, I hope.
http://lilypond.org/people/jan/gnu-windows/cygwin-cross-1.3.6.1.tar.gz
I've also added a small test package '
Hallo Carl,
2001-12-07 16:24:07, du schriebst:
> I'm interested in being the package maintainer for figlet. The latest
> version is 2.2 and was released in 1996 (and so I can't realistically see it
> being updated again). I have already compiled the source and created a
> tar.bz2 of the binari
Sorry. I should've identified the package in the original email. The one I
had planned on supporting was
http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/whois.html. It's always seemed to
work well for me. I wasn't aware the bw.org version, though. Any good
reason to pick that one versus the gnu packag
Just took a look at the bw.org version and realised that it's perl based.
I'd really rather support one that can be compiled. Without significant
reason otherwise, I'll stick with the gnu package.
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Frida
> From: Mark Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:00:40 -0500
>
> Any good reason to pick that one versus the gnu package?
If the GNU one is as smart as its project page says it is, I suppose
not :-).
Well, OK, I suppose one reason is that the BW version is written in
Pe
> From: Mark Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:04:27 -0500
>
> Just took a look at the bw.org version and realised that it's perl based.
> I'd really rather support one that can be compiled.
Why?
jik
No reliance on perl. Easier to use on stripped down cygwin installations.
I'd think that would be a benefit in the long run. I like perl, but I'd
think the compiled version would be preferred.
I also thought the mkpasswd inclusion was odd. I just ripped it out of the
source and said bye-bye.
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 04:30:12PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>Some people promised to have a look at my cross build scripts package
>so I've made some fixes. It should generate fully Cygwin compliant
>binary and source packages now, I hope.
I wonder if these same people will look at the cr
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:08:18AM -0500, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:55:02 +0100
>>From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>Which whois do you want to maintain?
>>http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/jwhois.html
>>http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/whois.html
>
Can you give a quickie pro/con list for the bw.org version?
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: whois package
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:08:18AM -0500, Jonathan
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:51:12AM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
>I'm interested in being the package maintainer for figlet. The latest
>version is 2.2 and was released in 1996 (and so I can't realistically
>see it being updated again). I have already compiled the source and
>created a tar.bz2 of th
Going back to dig and host, I'm guessing that the maintainer would need to
actually be a maintainer for the whole bind package? Am I right in assuming
that having bind as a cygwin package would provide libresolv functionality,
or would more be required.
BTW, I can get bind 9.2 to compile with so
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 04:30:12PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
>>Some people promised to have a look at my cross build scripts package
>>so I've made some fixes. It should generate fully Cygwin compliant
>>binary and source packages now, I hope.
>>
>
> I wonde
Hallo Christopher,
2001-12-07 18:02:54, du schriebst:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 04:30:12PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>Some people promised to have a look at my cross build scripts package
>>so I've made some fixes. It should generate fully Cygwin compliant
>>binary and source packages no
Hallo Mark,
2001-12-07 18:05:12, du schriebst:
> Going back to dig and host, I'm guessing that the maintainer would need to
> actually be a maintainer for the whole bind package? Am I right in assuming
> that having bind as a cygwin package would provide libresolv functionality,
> or would more
Hallo Christopher,
2001-12-07 18:25:21, du schriebst:
>>I'm interested in being the package maintainer for figlet.
> How about an explanation about what figlet is?
--
__ _ ___ _ _ _ _(_) |_
/ _` / -_) '_| '_| | _|
\__, \___|_| |_| |_|\__|
|___/
ok. Next question. Can we shamelessly steal code from bind for inclusion
in cygwin? I'm not familiar with its licensing, but the copyright notice
looks like it gives full permission to use their code as we see fit. Can I
get an amen from someone who knows what they're talking about here?
And
Looking back into the archives it seems that Robert thought the way to go
would be a stub resolver. Still think that way, Robert, and are you still
willing to help someone make it?
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Bradshaw
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:33 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 06:26:52PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Hallo Christopher,
>
>2001-12-07 18:25:21, du schriebst:
>
>>>I'm interested in being the package maintainer for figlet.
>
>> How about an explanation about what figlet is?
>
>--
> __ _ ___ _ _ _ _(_) |_
>/ _` / -_) '_| '_| | _|
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > __ _ ___ _ _ _ _(_) |_
> >/ _` / -_) '_| '_| | _|
> >\__, \___|_| |_| |_|\__|
> >|___/
>
> Was there something you wanted to say, here? Just quoting other
> people's messages isn't very useful.
In this case it was, look at
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:31:28AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > __ _ ___ _ _ _ _(_) |_
>> >/ _` / -_) '_| '_| | _|
>> >\__, \___|_| |_| |_|\__|
>> >|___/
>>
>> Was there something you wanted to say, here? Just quoting
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:31:28AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> >Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> > __ _ ___ _ _ _ _(_) |_
> >> >/ _` / -_) '_| '_| | _|
> >> >\__, \___|_| |_| |_|\__|
> >> >|___/
> >>
> >> Was there something you wanted t
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 07:31:34PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:31:28AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> >Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> >> > __ _ ___ _ _ _ _(_) |_
>> >> >/ _` / -_) '_| '_| | _|
>> >> >\__, \_
Hi again guys,
Sorry about the delay in responding. I've just been reading the archives
for the list (because I wasn't subscribed to the lists at home, until just
now that is) and I see there's been quite a lot of traffic. I'm not in
work until Monday now but as soon as I get there I'll upload
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 01:33:58AM +, Carl Ebrey wrote:
>Hi again guys,
>
>Sorry about the delay in responding. I've just been reading the archives
>for the list (because I wasn't subscribed to the lists at home, until just
>now that is) and I see there's been quite a lot of traffic. I'm not
31 matches
Mail list logo
