RE: whois package

2002-01-10 Thread Mark Bradshaw
I'm sorry to keep putting you guys through this, but could someone check over the new packages. I've updated from 4.5.15 to 4.5.17, which included an update to the .edu name servers. http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois Mark > -Original Message- > From: Mark Bradshaw > Sent: Thurs

RE: whois package

2002-01-10 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Actually, hold that thought. There's been an update, and it's decently important... :o( > -Original Message- > From: Mark Bradshaw > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:21 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: FW: whois package > > > Robert, I think I'm all ready. I've made the chan

FW: whois package

2002-01-10 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Robert, I think I'm all ready. I've made the changes you and Gerrit suggested. Small correction to the Makefile in the source to correct the prefix. Slightly expanded readme to explain the patch and how to apply it. Patch and readme moved to a CYGWIN-PATCHES directory. I'm ready when you are

Re: rsync-2.5.1-1

2002-01-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:18:52AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: >I prepared the package for the newest release of rsync. >It fails some tests, but (without need for special patches) is already >better than last version IMHO: last version didn't complain just because >didn't have a testsuite. I'll in

rsync-2.5.1-1

2002-01-10 Thread Lapo Luchini
I prepared the package for the newest release of rsync. It fails some tests, but (without need for special patches) is already better than last version IMHO: last version didn't complain just because didn't have a testsuite. I'll investigate more on this though. The address is always the same: ht

Re: tetex-beta-20001218 available for testing

2002-01-10 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Jan, 2002-01-10 12:44:17, du schriebst: > When you upload, is there a place I can download them from? Last > night I waited until the first japanese mirror carried them %-/ ftp://mirrors.rcn.net is always the first which finishes mirroring sources.redhat. -- begin signature: =^..^= end

Re: tetex-beta-20001218 available for testing

2002-01-10 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
"Jérôme-Georges-Michel BENOIT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Last night, I've rebuild the texmf packages, but I found that you > > removed some texmf files, fontname and web2c > >directories from tetex-bin/beta. > > This a big bug: I have to fix it: > I have to reinclude them in the next rebui

Re: tetex-beta-20001218 available for testing

2002-01-10 Thread Jérôme-Georges-Michel BENOIT
> Last night, I've rebuild the texmf packages, but I found that you > removed some texmf files, fontname and web2c >directories from tetex-bin/beta. This a big bug: I have to fix it: I have to reinclude them in the next rebuilt because the web2c directory contains binaries stuff (as the POOL file

Re: tetex-beta-20001218 available for testing

2002-01-10 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
"Jérôme-Georges-Michel BENOIT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Jérôme, > I have just put a new rebuilt of tetex-beta-20001218 for test. A > more mature version will be made out in accordance with a texmf > package. Last night, I've rebuild the texmf packages, but I found that you removed some t