> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Collins
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: emacs or xemacs
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> I've just added you to the cygwin-apps group on sources.redhat.com:
>
> cvs -d :ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co .
>
> Feel free to add a cygutils directory.
Okay -- I've added it and imported v0.9.7. Also, I've added Mark's last
implementation an
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >And then too, not all of them are even *meant* to be funny. ;-)
>
> I thought you were talking about the guy in M#A*S*H. He wasn't meant
> to be funny, or rather he was but he wasn't supposed to be purposely
> funny.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 10:41:09PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 09:36:17PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>> > > -Original Message-
>> >
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 09:36:17PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Davi
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:52:01PM +0100, Hack Kampbjørn wrote:
> > Ok, good point. I've now removed the /etc/wgetrc file from the package
> > and only copy it if none is present as suggested. I suppose I could
> > change the wget.sh to sed the postinstall script into
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:52:01PM +0100, Hack Kampbjørn wrote:
> Ok, good point. I've now removed the /etc/wgetrc file from the package
> and only copy it if none is present as suggested. I suppose I could
> change the wget.sh to sed the postinstall script into /etc/postintall
> instead of (as no
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 09:32:22PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > It looks pretty good to me -- I rebuilt it from source right now and it
> > seems okay. The *only* quibble I have is that the binary package
> > contains this file:
> >
> > /etc/wgetrc
> >
> > Since i
I'm guessing strip opens all files in binary mode, so that shouldn't
matter. However, I haven't used text mode mounts for quite some time, so
I doubt that's the explanation for my initial curl.dll issues.
--KEvin
Jason Tishler wrote:
>
> Any ideas why stripping prevents some DLLs from bei
Jason Tishler wrote:
>
> Any ideas why stripping prevents some DLLs from being rebased and
> not others? Any solutions besides not stripping?
>
Text mode mounts?
Earnie
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail
Rob,
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 12:21:11AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 1. Determine why cygcurl-2.dll and possibly other DLLs do not tolerate
> > rebasing.
>
> Hmm. Yes. Did you rebase .dll's after stripping them? And what strip
> options where used?
>On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 07:16:12AM -0800, Joshua
>Franklin wrote:
>> I've fixed my patch so it behaves correctly, but
>> I can't post to cygwin-patches as I'm not a
>> subscriber.
>> What to do?
>
>Subscribing?
>
>Corinna
Sigh. Perhaps when I get over being clueless I'll
contribute something us
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:07:31PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> I'm not quite sure how we may include Apache shared module DLL
> packages to the Cygwin net distro?! I would like to keep the core
> distribution stand alone and add something like "mod_ssl-2.x.tar.bz"
> for the shared modules only. I g
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> Yup. It's using the wrong path. And it doesn't work that
> way apparently without the option not to fork.
>
> I grubbed a bit in the apache documentation and found that the
> native Windows version has two command line options `-n' and
> `-k' to install, stop and re
Mark Bradshaw wrote:
> Charles,
>When you get back to reading the list, I'm ready to include last,
> utmpdump, and killall (working without /proc!) in cygutils. Drop me a
> line...
If you've already done the work of integrating your new files and
makefile changes into the cygutils sourc
Charles,
When you get back to reading the list, I'm ready to include last,
utmpdump, and killall (working without /proc!) in cygutils. Drop me a
line...
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:11 AM
> To: '[E
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 07:16:12AM -0800, Joshua Franklin wrote:
> I've fixed my patch so it behaves correctly, but
> I can't post to cygwin-patches as I'm not a
> subscriber.
> What to do?
Subscribing?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:13:38PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > Btw., I've found the description how to install apache as service
> > under cygrunsrv. The only problem was that it's on a html page
> > so I first found it after I already had installed apache under in
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> Btw., I've found the description how to install apache as service
> under cygrunsrv. The only problem was that it's on a html page
> so I first found it after I already had installed apache under inetd.
so I guess you mean http://httpd.apache.org/docs/cygwin.html#ser
I've fixed my patch so it behaves correctly, but
I can't post to cygwin-patches as I'm not a
subscriber.
What to do?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
Hi List,
Last night, I've built the texmf-* suite matching Jerome's
latest rebuild tetex-beta-20001218-3.
It is available for testing at:
http://lilypond.org/cygwin/testing/tar/texmf
Note:
* These packages depend on tetex-beta-20001218-3 for full operation.
* If you install by hand, ru
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:00:53PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hack Kampbjørn
> >
> >
> > "Roth, Kevin P." wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, I checked an actual SSL connection. It actually worked ;-)
>
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 09:32:22PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> It looks pretty good to me -- I rebuilt it from source right now and it
> seems okay. The *only* quibble I have is that the binary package
> contains this file:
>
> /etc/wgetrc
>
> Since it is just a copy of /usr/doc/wget-1.7.1
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:06:08PM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
> Charles:
> OK. Scratch killall. I didn't realize it used /proc. :o( Anyway,
> what do you want for last and utmpdump.
>
> Anyone else:
> Is there anyone currently working on a /proc filesystem, or have
> plans that d
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 09:36:17PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Starks-Browning
> >
> > This is not *the* Ken Stevens, is it?
> >
>
> The guy that did "Wild World" and "Peace Train"?
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 09:22:07AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > If you could patch httpd to get a new option which differs from the
> > usual run mode only by not forking and detaching the master process,
> > we could start it using cygrunsrv as well. That shouldn't be t
Stipe Tolj wrote:
> BTW, is this going to be released then as package apache-1.3.22-4 or
> do we version back to -1? -- I guess users may be confused and may
> assume there have been 3 previous releases? Anyway I vote for -4,
> otherwise we would break the "respect revision numbers in any case"
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> This is similar to the -X option in httpd but that option let httpd
> running in single process mode. That's more like the -d option in
> sshd which is only useful for debugging purposes, either.
yep.
> If you could patch httpd to get a new option which differs from
28 matches
Mail list logo
