Re: RFP: NASM

On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:42:48AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Hallo, Is someone willing to maintain NASM, the netwide assembler? You? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL

Re: Setup.exe release-candidate

From: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 04:35 Subject: RE: Setup.exe release-candidate -Original Message- From: Max Bowsher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:32 PM At 11:00

Re: Link for MORE

I have no objection if the original contributors want to take the cygutils source package, rip out everything that isn't (for instance) 'mkshortcut'-related, and release a standalone autotool'ed mkshortcut. (However, I'm not pushing for that.) Personally, I feel a good test is whether it's

[PATCH] Reinstate version number magic in Makefile.in for setup.exe

Checked into branch and trunk. I uploaded a new version of setup.exe to sources.redhat.com, too, since this was affecting setup.ini creation. cgf 2002-03-19 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Makefile.in (setup_version.c): Add back magic which allows detection of

Re: Setup.exe release-candidate

On Win98, setup concludes rather badly. In previous incarnations, setup would launch a DOS window. Quite often that would freeze my machine, reasons unclear. However, it was possible to murder winoldap using the three-finger-salute and that would return me to normal functioning - usually

Re: release setup now?

- Original Message - From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: CygWin-Apps [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 22:24 Subject: Re: release setup now? I think so. I know of two minor (non-show-stopper) nits: 1) IF (and only if) folks

RE: [PATCH] Reinstate version number magic in Makefile.in for setup.exe

Thanks.

Re: ssh Keychain?

Robert Collins wrote: Someone mentioned this a while back... did anything come of that? That would be me. I proposed to package it, send a setup.hint. And added a task to follow up on it and count the votes. I even made a package -- I just forget that it's not enough to have a TODO list.

RE: RFP: NASM

Do they have cygwin versions? Are they interested in having it available via setup.exe? Rob -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RFP: NASM I kinda thought the people at nasm.2y.net

libintl1

appears to be in a lib category, not libs. Rob

RE: release setup now?

Thanks Michael - do you want to put that somewhere on the web (it could be at www.cygwin.com), and we can advise the cygwin crowd that tested... that they should run this? Cheers, Rob

Re: release setup now?

On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 02:38:51PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: Thanks Michael - do you want to put that somewhere on the web (it could be at www.cygwin.com), and we can advise the cygwin crowd that tested... that they should run this? You can submit an announcement or submit it as software.

RE: release setup now?

-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: release setup now? On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 02:38:51PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: Thanks Michael - do you want to put that

Re: libintl1

On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:58:37PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: Robert Collins wrote: appears to be in a lib category, not libs. oops. I'll fix it when I get home (yep, still at work...) I fixed it already, Chuck. I didn't think you'd mind. cgf

Re: Volunteering to package texinfo-4.1

On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:17:42PM +1100, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote: Building gcc-3.1 now requires texinfo-4.1. It builds OOTB. If there are no objections I will package it up over the weekend and submit it. Thanks for the offer but I'm all set up to handle this. I may rethink this if

RE: ssh Keychain?

-Original Message- From: Hack Kampbjørn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ssh Keychain? Robert Collins wrote: Someone mentioned this a while back... did anything come of that? That would be me.

Re: Volunteering to package texinfo-4.1

On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:17:42PM +1100, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote: Building gcc-3.1 now requires texinfo-4.1. It builds OOTB. If there are no objections I will package it up over the weekend and submit it. Can you actually build texinfo-4.1, David? I can't build it on either linux or

Re: Volunteering to package texinfo-4.1

On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 04:24:02PM +1100, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote: Built it about 6 times already (for various sad reasons). /usr/local/src/texinfo-4.1/configure --prefix=/usr make make install Yeah, I figured it out. It doesn't like being cross-compiled. I forgot about that.

Re: RFP: NASM

Do they have cygwin versions? Are they interested in having it available via setup.exe? Rob *shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with cygwin without a hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure)

Re: And we have a xfree cygwin package.. (What are they called?)

On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 04:13:06PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: And we have a xfree cygwin package.. (What are

RE: And we have a xfree cygwin package.. (What are they called?)

-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM I don't see any reason to delay adopting XFree86 into the main setup. So, lets not worry about customizing anything or offering alternate setup.ini's. I don't see

Volunteering to package texinfo-4.1

Building gcc-3.1 now requires texinfo-4.1. It builds OOTB. If there are no objections I will package it up over the weekend and submit it.