RE: fastcall

2002-04-07 Thread Danny Smith
I've noticed this thread on cywgin. I actually have been discussing this with ReactOS team recently. The ReactOs patchset for fastcall support in GCC and binutils has been in my local sandbox for 3.1 and causes no regressions with GCC/binutils testsuites. It has been in a mingw gcc 2.95.3

RE: fastcall

2002-04-07 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Danny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 8:29 AM In order to get it into official sources, the ReactOS team will need some support. What sort of support can we offer? I'm happy to vouch that 'it works for me'. We've been round

Re: fastcall

2002-04-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:29:29AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote: I've noticed this thread on cywgin. I actually have been discussing this with ReactOS team recently. The ReactOs patchset for fastcall support in GCC and binutils has been in my local sandbox for 3.1 and causes no regressions with

Re: fastcall

2002-04-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:54:00AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: Chris asked the question a while ago: Wanna be a binutils maintainer. Are you asking if someone here can step up? I'd love to, but I suspect I don't have the time to do a good job. I'm struggling to answer all setup.exe related

Re: fastcall

2002-04-07 Thread Danny Smith
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:29:29AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote: maintainer. There are currently bugs in binutils with respect to ld --shared (or at least there was two weeks ago and has been since 17 [UTC] December). URL? I don't see

Re: fastcall

2002-04-07 Thread Danny Smith
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:54:00AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: Chris asked the question a while ago: Wanna be a binutils maintainer. Are you asking if someone here can step up? I'd love to, but I suspect I don't have the time to do a good

Re: fastcall

2002-04-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:28:20AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote: --- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:29:29AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote: maintainer. There are currently bugs in binutils with respect to ld --shared (or at least there was two weeks ago and has

RE: fastcall

2002-04-07 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: fastcall On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:54:00AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: Chris asked the question a while ago: Wanna be a binutils

Re: fastcall

2002-04-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 12:23:28PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: Robert, out of curiousity, do you have an assignment with the FSF? Yes, for GNU litbool. If I need to do another, I'm quite happy to do so. I don't think it is a requirement for a binutils maintainer but it probably couldn't hurt

Checksums [Was Re:fastcall]

2002-04-07 Thread Danny Smith
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:28:20AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote: --- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:29:29AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote: If so, I am happy checking in windres patches. The checksum patch

RE: Checksums [Was Re:fastcall]

2002-04-07 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 12:57 PM Maybe I should create a user on sourceware called Daniel G. Collins who can approve binutils patches. :-) If you drop the G, I'll write my half-brother and see if he's