Here is a fix for the problem of postinstall not running.
I'm not going to check this one into the trunk because it uses a static
variable and "feels wrong" as a result. I think we probably need to
change the find interface, either to just return the relative path or
the full path as needed.
I
Hallo Robert,
Am Dienstag, 14. Mai 2002 um 13:39 schriebst du:
> I think no-one has had time. I recall several yea votes previously, so
> it just takes me/corinna/chris/chuck/ anyone else with write access to
> upload the packages. I don't recall who (if anyone) has sanity checked
> the packages
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Harold Hunt wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Chris Faylor had said that apps that run under X need to go in the XFree86
> directory... but I'm not sure if that means that it should be stuffed into
> the XFree86 category as well:
>
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-04/msg00538.htm
Peter,
Chris Faylor had said that apps that run under X need to go in the XFree86
directory... but I'm not sure if that means that it should be stuffed into
the XFree86 category as well:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-04/msg00538.html
Does x3270 only have an X component or does it run i
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Peter A. Castro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:57 AM
>
> > I'd like to submit couple of packages that I've built under
> > Cygwin, but I'm at a loss as to a proper category.
> ..
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter A. Castro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:57 AM
> I'd like to submit couple of packages that I've built under
> Cygwin, but I'm at a loss as to a proper category.
...
> It's
> basically a Telnet app which handles 3270 p
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> Uhm, Utils comes to mind.
Thanks for the response!
I considdered that, but it's not quite a utility. Tools like diff or sed
or awk, those are utilities, but a 3270 emulator... I couldn't quite make
myself categorize it as such. Ask yourself, would 'te
Uhm, Utils comes to mind.
Earnie.
"Peter A. Castro" wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I have a question on package classifications. I've read through the
> Cygwin Package Contributors Guide and found the list of approved categories:
>
> Admin Archive Base Database Devel
> Doc Editors Games G
Hi All,
I have a question on package classifications. I've read through the
Cygwin Package Contributors Guide and found the list of approved categories:
Admin Archive Base Database Devel
Doc Editors Games Graphics Interpreters
LibsMailMath Net Shells
System Text
Teun Burgers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've uploaded binary and source packages of GSL,
> homepage www.fsf.org/software/gsl/
> These are the URL's of binary and source tarballs:
>
> http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1-src.tar.bz2
> http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl
Robert Collins wrote:
> Any reason why diff and diff-utils are in the 'base' category?
>
> They seem much more 'devel' to me.
I hate to always be a pain about 'base', but I use diff for a lot of
non-devel things. Lists of name with duplicates that you only need the
duplicates, for example:
# un
Hello,
I've uploaded binary and source packages of GSL,
homepage www.fsf.org/software/gsl/
These are the URL's of binary and source tarballs:
http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1-src.tar.bz2
http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1.tar.bz2
The tarballs were pre
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: setup releases
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:36:33PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >The last couple of
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:36:33PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>The last couple of setup.exe uploads you've done have been faulty in
>one way or another - linked against cygwin1.dll, not stripped.
I've already explained why I linked against cygwin. IMO, your configury
is badly BADLY broken, at
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:07:53PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:55 AM
>
>
>> The attached patch seems to fix this and some other problems.
>>
>> I've uploaded a new version
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:53:36PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>Checking for \\setup.ini should be enough as long as / is never returned
>by the find function. I'll do something like this in HEAD soon.
I changed the find function to use \ since I seem to recall that some
versions of Windows had
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:55:37AM +0200, "Schaible, Jörg" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> cygpath now supports an option -H that can be used to retrieve the Windows'
> profile diretcory root. Mapping this directory to /home you can achieve a
> Unix like schema /home/ and gain support for roaming profiles.
>
Hi Chris,
you should have one from late 1999 or beginning of 2000 ...
Regards,
Jorg
>-Original Message-
>From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:36 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [PATCH]: cygpath.cc
>
>
>On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:55:3
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: upset now understands 'external-source' option
>
>
>
>
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > Anyone want to submit the corresponding we
Chris,
The last couple of setup.exe uploads you've done have been
faulty in one way or another - linked against cygwin1.dll, not stripped.
This is the recipe I use to build releases (and thus keeps me out of
forgetting things :}):
$ make && make dist && strip setup.exe \
&& mv setup-0.t
20 matches
Mail list logo
