No, but thanks for checking. The source maintainer upgraded his versions of autotools,
and since then I haven't been able to cleanly build without rebuilding the
Makefile.in's first. I don't have the knowledge or expertise needed to actually find
the specific problem, so I just rebuilt all of
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 07:28, Max Bowsher wrote:
The principal difficulty is that there is no good framework in place for
persisting setup's configuration.
Yep. In fact I've commented on this before - that we need a common
persistence mechanism to deal with the moving requirements for where to
From: Robert Collins
Sent: Wednesday, 20 November 2002 7:49 pm
To: Max Bowsher
Cc: Thomas Chadwick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Errors when building setup.exe
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 07:19, Max Bowsher wrote:
PS to Robert Collins: Perhaps the setup source tarball should be removed
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 08:05, John Morrison wrote:
I think he means replace, not remove ;)
Even so. The source downloadable via setup is that for the same version
we offer on cygwin.com. To replace it with a newer version's tarball
means we need a new version of setup available there.
Rob
--
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 08:05, John Morrison wrote:
I think he means replace, not remove ;)
Even so. The source downloadable via setup is that for the same version
we offer on cygwin.com. To replace it with a newer version's tarball
means we
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 05:18, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
I've decided to call it quits on the package. Announcement at
http://www.networksimplicity.com/openssh/.
I hope we can make a minimal cygwin w/ssh as easy to use and install as
your package was. Good luck with your next endeavour(s).
Cheers,
Even so. The source downloadable via setup is that for the same version
we offer on cygwin.com. To replace it with a newer version's tarball
means we need a new version of setup available there.
*shrug* I know.
How's it going anyway?
Massive overhauls. Much new functionality. Not
Nyah, just make a command option to ignore 'insane mount tables'. That
gives the know-it-alls a knob to twist.
Rob, PROMISE me that this option gets the long name
--ignore-insane-mount-tables. PROMISE ME!
How about this: Whoever implements it gets to name it :}.
There's always
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:50:15PM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
If this is excessively large, I could attempt just rebuilding the specific
one-or-two Makefile.in's that are affected. Do you want me to do that? Or, since this
is just the source package, could we leave it as is for now, and
