Re: [patch] Help Option

2002-11-25 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 13:24, Max Bowsher wrote: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thats interesting. It works here (with -mno-cygwin -mwindows). What OS. Running from what shell? CYGWIN=?? rxvt being used? WinXP SP1. cygwin 1.3.15-2. bash

Re: RSA or DSA ssh keypairs preferred?

2002-11-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:09:50AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You will need a ssh keypair though, so if you don't have one, you may as well prepare it now. Any preference RSA or DSA? I've never managed to find anything saying whether one is better

RE: Sorry Robert, your bugfix hasn't entirely worked.

2002-11-25 Thread Morrison, John
From: Max Bowsher PS: Attached is a patch which colour-codes version numbers in setup. Obviously its going to require much discussion before checkin, but it is what allowed me to notice the bug so easily. The colour code is: Dark Blue:[curr] Cyan:[prev] Yellow-Brown: [prev]

Re: RSA or DSA ssh keypairs preferred?

2002-11-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 08:32:22AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ssh-keygen -t rsa creates an RSA key for SSH2. This is preferable over RSA1 and DSA keys due to security flaws in both. Aha. That's what I wanted to know. Are there any links you

Comments in setup.exe ?

2002-11-25 Thread Yann Crausaz
Hello, As I'm working on setup.exe (see former messages), I'm wondering if a commented version of this program would exist anywhere ? If so, where ? Some functions are quite difficult to understand, unless for me... PS : I'm working on the CVS HEAD version which hasn't much more comments than

Re: Comments in setup.exe ?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 21:10, Yann Crausaz wrote: Hello, As I'm working on setup.exe (see former messages), I'm wondering if a commented version of this program would exist anywhere ? If so, where ? Some functions are quite difficult to understand, unless for me... Just ask about the

Re: [patch] Help Option

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 19:26, Max Bowsher wrote: I'm strongly tempted to just dump the current output into a MessageBox, though. Sure. I'll wager that there will be less code doing what I suggested that fiddling with string reparsing. I wasn't suggesting the output be fancy after all :}. Rob

other setup issue (HEAD)

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
The sort order is kinda weird. Try looking in the full list for a non installed package. Just a note to prevent it being forgotten.. Rob -- --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. --- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

default version logic fixed (really!)

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
Uhmm, consider it a typo. Yeah, that'll do. New snapshot uploaded now. Rob -- --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. --- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: other setup issue (HEAD)

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 23:16, Robert Collins wrote: The sort order is kinda weird. Try looking in the full list for a non installed package. (I know what the issue is here, just haven't fixed it yet). Rob -- --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. ---

Re: [patch] Help Option

2002-11-25 Thread Max Bowsher
Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That depends on how it's coded. The -mwindows switch alone doesn't cause the abscense of stdio. foo.c #include stdlib.h #include stdio.h #include windows.h int WINAPI WinMain ( HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, LPSTR

Re: Comments in setup.exe ?

2002-11-25 Thread Max Bowsher
Yann Crausaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I'm working on setup.exe (see former messages), I'm wondering if a commented version of this program would exist anywhere ? If so, where ? Some functions are quite difficult to understand, unless for me... Now why would there be 2 versions of setup,

Re: [patch] Help Option

2002-11-25 Thread Earnie Boyd
Max Bowsher wrote: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That depends on how it's coded. The -mwindows switch alone doesn't cause the abscense of stdio. foo.c #include stdlib.h #include stdio.h #include windows.h int WINAPI WinMain ( HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance,

Re: [patch] Help Option

2002-11-25 Thread Max Bowsher
Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That depends on how it's coded. The -mwindows switch alone doesn't cause the abscense of stdio. I couldn't get your foo.c to produce any output in a cmd shell. (It does in a Cygwin shell) Now,

Re: [patch] Help Option

2002-11-25 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
max@POMELLO [/mnt/install] $ ./setup-2.296_i.exe -h -h --help Show this help I believe it's better to describe the --help option as Show help output and exit instead of referring to this. The reason is that one can use a script like GNU help2man to create a usable

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: binutils-20021117-1

2002-11-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:31:06PM +0300, egor duda wrote: Chris Faylor wrote: I can see code in dll_crt0_1 being called for handling relocs. Is it your intent that every new DLL will have to specifically call _pei386_runtime_relocator? The dll may have its own pseudo-relocs. When app.exe uses

Re: setup.exe-HEAD should build from CVS on gcc-3.

2002-11-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:59:22AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 11:04, Max Bowsher wrote: No. I haven't had any need for one until now. Please follow the instructions on the cygwin site for getting CVS write access, it tells you

setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
I've fixed the sort bug and uploaded a snapshot. Max, what letter is free for the antivirus to use as a shortcut? Other than that, does anyone (Pavel? Gary? Max? ...) have any specific enhancements or bugfixes to be included. If not, once that letter is fixed, I'll announce to the cygwin list

RE: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread John Morrison
Rob, Have you removed the passwd.bat file setup (used?) to create? J. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Collins Sent: Monday, 25 November 2002 8:19 pm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: setup now ready for a release? I've

[ITP] grace 5.1.10

2002-11-25 Thread Volker Quetschke
Hi! As I needed this program for my work anyway I packaged grace for cygwin. Grace is great for data analysis/presentation and it compiled OOTB. I only changed the default on-line documentation viewer from netscape (obviosly not there) to lynx and the default editor to nano. Here are the

Re: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Marcel Telka
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:19:02AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: I've fixed the sort bug and uploaded a snapshot. Max, what letter is free for the antivirus to use as a shortcut? Other than that, does anyone (Pavel? Gary? Max? ...) have any specific enhancements or bugfixes to be included. If

RE: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:27, John Morrison wrote: Rob, Have you removed the passwd.bat file setup (used?) to create? Oh, Frabjous joy. No, I hadn't. You do both /etc/passwd and /etc/group now don't you? Rob -- --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. ---

Re: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:34, Marcel Telka wrote: Please add my FTP related patch. Thanks. Done, and thanks. Rob -- --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. --- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've fixed the sort bug and uploaded a snapshot. Max, what letter is free for the antivirus to use as a shortcut? -D --download Download from internet -L --local-install Install from local directory -s

RE: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread John Morrison
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:27, John Morrison wrote: Rob, Have you removed the passwd.bat file setup (used?) to create? Oh, Frabjous joy. No, I hadn't. You do both /etc/passwd and /etc/group now don't you? Yep :) And the script to add

RE: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:52, John Morrison wrote: Yep :) And the script to add /etc/hosts, network, protocol and services which was sent to the list :) And /etc/profile?, please say yes :}. Rob -- --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. --- signature.asc

Re: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:58, Marcel Telka wrote: Sorry, but your commit is different from my patch and probably will break FTP support in setup.exe. Your: - sscanf (paren + 1, %d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d, i1, i2, i3, i4, p1, p2); + sscanf (digit + 1, %d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d, i1, i2, i3, i4, p1, p2);

Remaining setup bug

2002-11-25 Thread Max Bowsher
2.299 allows you to select a version that you don't have on disc, and then proceeds to remove your current version, and replace it with nothing, with no error, either. (This is install from local directory mode.) Max.

RE: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread John Morrison
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:52, John Morrison wrote: Yep :) And the script to add /etc/hosts, network, protocol and services which was sent to the list :) And /etc/profile?, please say yes :}. Oh, ok then :) Yes, /etc/profile

Re: Remaining setup bug

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:01, Max Bowsher wrote: 2.299 allows you to select a version that you don't have on disc, and then proceeds to remove your current version, and replace it with nothing, with no error, either. (This is install from local directory mode.) Max, I need a how-to-reproduce at

RE: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:01, John Morrison wrote: From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:52, John Morrison wrote: Yep :) And the script to add /etc/hosts, network, protocol and services which was sent to the list :) And /etc/profile?, please say

Re: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:53, Max Bowsher wrote: It would be nice to get my Categories patch in. The sources new account form didn't like my ssh public key (must it be a version 1 rsa key? Discussion here seemed to suggest version 2.), so I doubt I'll be up and running before you want to

Re: Remaining setup bug

2002-11-25 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins wrote: On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:01, Max Bowsher wrote: 2.299 allows you to select a version that you don't have on disc, and then proceeds to remove your current version, and replace it with nothing, with no error, either. (This is install from local directory mode.) Max, I

Re: Remaining setup bug

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:10, Max Bowsher wrote: Sorry. setup-HEAD (2.301, now ;-) ) Run. Install from Local directory mode. Choose a package version that is *not* in your local cache dir. (Personally, I don't keep [prev] packages past a few days.) Setup uninstalls it, and announces

Re: Remaining setup bug

2002-11-25 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins wrote: On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:10, Max Bowsher wrote: Sorry. setup-HEAD (2.301, now ;-) ) Run. Install from Local directory mode. Choose a package version that is *not* in your local cache dir. (Personally, I don't keep [prev] packages past a few days.) Setup uninstalls it,

Re: Remaining setup bug

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:19, Max Bowsher wrote: Maybe its my quirky way of downloading stuff. Call this non-critical, at least to a snapshot, and I'll investigate. 'K. Rob -- --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. --- signature.asc Description: This is

rsa1 vs. rsa2 keys for sources.redhat.com (was Re: setup now ready for a release?)

2002-11-25 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:53, Max Bowsher wrote: It would be nice to get my Categories patch in. The sources new account form didn't like my ssh public key (must it be a version 1 rsa key? Discussion here seemed to suggest version 2.), so I doubt I'll

Re: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Marcel Telka
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:01:52AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:58, Marcel Telka wrote: Sorry, but your commit is different from my patch and probably will break FTP support in setup.exe. Your: - sscanf (paren + 1, %d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d, i1, i2, i3, i4, p1,

RE: Are there any resizable setup works-in-progress out there?

2002-11-25 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 16:02, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 11:21, Max Bowsher wrote: Are there any resizable setup works-in-progress out there? Gary was making noises at one point. Noises and grindingly slow progress. It's ~99.44% working now. I've mainly

RE: Are there any resizable setup works-in-progress out there?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 14:32, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: Actually, yeah. I've made some changes to window.{h,cc} that shouldn't wreck anything, and get rid of that horrific HWND-this cobble I had before. I'll do a quick changelog and post the diff to -patches. To here please. -patches is for

RE: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
I've fixed the sort bug and uploaded a snapshot. Max, what letter is free for the antivirus to use as a shortcut? Other than that, does anyone (Pavel? Gary? Max? ...) have any specific enhancements or bugfixes to be included. Unless you want that OnActivate() change in, I don't have anything

RE: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 15:49, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: I've fixed the sort bug and uploaded a snapshot. Max, what letter is free for the antivirus to use as a shortcut? Other than that, does anyone (Pavel? Gary? Max? ...) have any specific enhancements or bugfixes to be included.

[PATCH] Setup Window class improvements.

2002-11-25 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
Here it is: 2002-11-25 Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] * window.h (Window::GetWindowRect): New method declaration. (Window::GetClientRect): Ditto. (Window::MoveWindow): Ditto. (Window::ScreenToClient): Ditto. * window.cc (REFLECTION_INFO): Remove.

RE: setup now ready for a release?

2002-11-25 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 15:49, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: I've fixed the sort bug and uploaded a snapshot. Max, what letter is free for the antivirus to use as a shortcut? Other than that, does anyone (Pavel? Gary? Max? ...) have any specific enhancements or bugfixes to be included.