On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 09:49:31AM +0800, Dean Scarff wrote:
>As per your suggestion to add the extra docs to the nasm package, I
>have found that nasm requires AFPL ghostscript to build the pdf. This
>package is not currently part of cygwin (although there is an old
>contrib that never made it he
As per your suggestion to add the extra docs to the nasm package, I have found that
nasm requires AFPL ghostscript to build the pdf. This package is not currently part
of cygwin (although there is an old contrib that never made it here:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00185.
I would like to provide an LPRng package. This brings up a couple of
points.
1) What should be done about the lpr.exe provided by cygutils?
I'm willing to rename "my" lpr (it's actually Rick Rankin's) to
something like "lpr-simple", but I don't think it should be removed
entirely. Rick's cod
- Original Message -
From: Joshua Daniel Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 11:02:09 -0800 (PST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nasm packaging review] was Re: Pending packages status
> ...
> An alternative would be to have a separate nasm-doc package with all th
