Proposing TCM as a Cygwin package

2003-01-10 Thread Daniel Bößwetter
Dear cygwin-apps, I would like to become the maintainer of the TCM port for Cygwin. TCM is a drawing tool for X11 with a focus on ERM, UML and oher software design notations (see http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/~tcm/). It is released under the GPL. I patched version 2.01 to run on Cygwin (see my

Re: Proposing TCM as a cygwin package

2003-01-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 04:13:58PM +0100, Daniel B??wetter wrote: Dear cygwin-apps, I would like to become the maintainer of the TCM port for Cygwin. TCM is a drawing tool for X11 with a focus on ERM, UML and oher software design notations (see http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/~tcm/). It is

Re: Proposing TCM as a cygwin package

2003-01-10 Thread Lapo Luchini
Christopher Faylor wrote: Let me know what you think. You've got my vote. I was actually in need /and in search) of such a software. Got mine, too. -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)

HEADS UP maintainers: New openssl version 0.9.7

2003-01-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Heads up maintainers of curl, exim, fetchmail, links, lynx (huh, that's me!), mod_php4, mod_ssl, mutt, pine, python and wget. I've just released the new openssl-0.9.7 package which overrides openssl-0.9.6. 0.9.6h will still be available but only the runtime libs (aka DLLs) for compatibility

Re: HEADS UP maintainers: New openssl version 0.9.7

2003-01-10 Thread Max Bowsher
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Heads up maintainers of curl, exim, fetchmail, links, lynx (huh, that's me!), mod_php4, mod_ssl, mutt, pine, python and wget. I've just released the new openssl-0.9.7 package which overrides openssl-0.9.6. 0.9.6h will still be available but only the runtime libs (aka

setup and ntsec

2003-01-10 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
I have studied complains on the list related to the interaction of setup and ntsec, sometimes asking privately for details. Here are the results of the investigation and some recommendations. First some background: 1) ACLs of installed files are determined by the inheritance properties of the

ntsec patch for setup

2003-01-10 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
This is the patch mentioned in the previous e-mail. I seems to work fine on NT and an early version was tested on 2000 (there are differences). Essentially the installed files should be in the Users or Admins groups instead of None. Nothing changes if the user running setup does not have the

Re: setup and ntsec

2003-01-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:35:24PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: I have studied complaints on the list related to the interaction of setup and ntsec, sometimes asking privately for details. Here are the results of the investigation and some recommendations. Wow. You really went out of your