Re: pdksh package proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 07:03:17AM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote: http://twoducks.exposure.org.uk/elfyn/cygwin/pdksh/pdksh-5.2.14-1-src.tar.bz 2 http://twoducks.exposure.org.uk/elfyn/cygwin/pdksh/pdksh-5.2.14-1.tar.bz2 http://twoducks.exposure.org.uk/elfyn/cygwin/pdksh/setup.hint category:

Re: pdksh package proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 07:03:17AM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote: http://twoducks.exposure.org.uk/elfyn/cygwin/pdksh/pdksh-5.2.14-1-src.tar.bz 2 http://twoducks.exposure.org.uk/elfyn/cygwin/pdksh/pdksh-5.2.14-1.tar.bz2 http://twoducks.exposure.org.uk/elfyn/cygwin/pdksh/setup.hint

Re: pdksh package proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Elfyn McBratney
Even though you install the /etc files via postinstall script, they are already installed in /etc. This way they do overwrite the already existing files and the postinstall script will do basically nothing. Corinna Kewl! I have just uplaoded the package, removed the files in /etc

Re: pdksh package proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:49:55AM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote: http://twoducks.exposure.org.uk/elfyn/cygwin/pdksh/pdksh-5.2.14-1-src.tar.b z2 http://twoducks.exposure.org.uk/elfyn/cygwin/pdksh/pdksh-5.2.14-1.tar.bz2 http://twoducks.exposure.org.uk/elfyn/cygwin/pdksh/setup.hint Looks good

Pending packages status

2003-02-20 Thread Pavel Tsekov
1. grace date : 25 Nov 2002 version: 5.1.10-1 status : not reviewed notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html votes : 2 (Lapo and Robert) url: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1-src.tar.bz2

Re: Pending packages status

2003-02-20 Thread Marcel Telka
Napsan da 2003.02.20 11:32, (autor: Pavel Tsekov): 1. grace 2. nfs-server 3. LPRng 4. ifhp 5. TCM 6. par 7. pdksh There are missing my DocBook XML packages :-(. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00148.html Regards. -- +---+ | Marcel

[Fixed] Pending packages status

2003-02-20 Thread Pavel Tsekov
The previous post didn't include the DocBook utility packages proposed by Marcel Telka. 1. grace date : 25 Nov 2002 version: 5.1.10-1 status : not reviewed notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html votes : 2 (Lapo and Robert) url:

Re: pdksh package proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello, I've reviewed the package files and found the following: 1. The CYGWIN-PATCHES includes two patches - you only need the one in pdksh-5.2.14-1.patch. It's not good to keep the patch itself in CYGWIN-PATCHES, it should be extracted in /usr/src. Take a look at http://cygwin.com/setup.html,

Re: pdksh package proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Max Bowsher
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:27:32PM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote: 4. I see that the binary package includes /usr/bin/ksh.exe. It may be better to renamed this to /usr/bin/pdksh.exe, just in case someone packages ATT's ksh for Cygwin. Hmm, I disagree. pdksh should be used

Re: pdksh package proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:27:32PM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote: 4. I see that the binary package includes /usr/bin/ksh.exe. It may be better to renamed this to /usr/bin/pdksh.exe, just in case someone packages ATT's ksh for Cygwin. Hmm, I

Re: Re: pdksh package proposal

2003-02-20 Thread Elfyn McBratney
You wrote: I'm at work now and can't really get the time to fix this so when I get home I'll re-package the changes. Btw, I did use Charles' script, from the link on http://cygwin.com/setup.html . IMO, it should stay as ksh.exe and have a symlink to pdksh.exe. One question: Should I

Re: pdksh package proposal (ATT ksh93 info)

2003-02-20 Thread Nicholas Wourms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Elfyn McBratney wrote: No problem...I was waiting to see if the ATT ksh would crop up so jumped at the chance when I saw yours and Igor's message :-) I have a script to build the ATT ksh93 if you want to work on beating it into package form. We use ksh93 and some

Re: [ITP] rebase

2003-02-20 Thread Jason Tishler
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 08:15:51PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: Jason Tishler wrote: When I link with popt. (2) But isn't rebase written in C++? Which version? :,) The first version is C++. The second version (this one) is C, because I considered contributing it to binutils. The third

Re: Pending packages status

2003-02-20 Thread Nicholas Wourms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Napsan da 2003.02.20 11:32, (autor: Pavel Tsekov): 1. grace 2. nfs-server 3. LPRng 4. ifhp 5. TCM 6. par 7. pdksh There are missing my DocBook XML packages :-(. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00148.html Not that I object, but as someone who is well

CMake 1.6.5-1

2003-02-20 Thread William A. Hoffman
There has been a new release of the official cmake (1.6.5). This is a minor release from 1.6.3 to 1.6.5. Changes from 1.6.4 to 1.6.5 A fix to the TestForANSIForScope module so that it doesn't keep check each configure. A fix to the Visual studio 7 generator to better support Visual studio 7.1.

update-setup

2003-02-20 Thread otmar . tschendel
I like to generate private setup.ini files for our local cygwin package distribution. We have a lot private cygwin program packages, we like to install with the setup program. I have heard there should be a script update-setup. Where can i get it ? Thanks for your help. Otmar Tschendel Philips

Re: update-setup

2003-02-20 Thread Max Bowsher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like to generate private setup.ini files for our local cygwin package distribution. We have a lot private cygwin program packages, we like to install with the setup program. I have heard there should be a script update-setup. Where can i get it ? cvs