--- Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2003-03-31 at
10:17, Danny Smith wrote:
I'll make the _CRTIMP macro a no-op by default if someone will confirm
that
there is a problem with setup.
So, is that CVS mingw-runtime only?
src/winsup/mingw
And is there a setup.exe
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hallo Cygwinners,
perl-5.8.0-2 is ready for release, I think it should
be ok, but a short review doesn't hurt;)
Gerrit, is the download site working ? I tried both from my office and
from sources.redhat.com and the download doesn't start.
Hello,
Since the list of pending packages is quite big now, I decided to remove
nfs-server from it. It was taking a lot of space and now there is no
activity on it anyway. Once Sam Robb gets back, I'll include nfs-server
back in the list.
1. LPRng
date : 21 Jan 2003
version: 3.8.19-1
status
Danny Smith wrote:
I've been expecting a bug report for mingw-runtime and ini.cc in setup for
awhile, but haven't seen one, so I'll ask if the CVS mingw runtime is
getting any testing with setup anymore.
Was it ever?
The problem is in the default usage of _CRTIMP ( =
Pavel schrieb:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hallo Cygwinners,
perl-5.8.0-2 is ready for release, I think it should
be ok, but a short review doesn't hurt;)
Gerrit, is the download site working ? I tried both from my office and
from sources.redhat.com and the download
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
perl-5.8.0-2 is ready for release, I think it should
be ok, but a short review doesn't hurt;)
Gerrit, is the download site working ? I tried both from my office and
from sources.redhat.com and the download doesn't start.
Heck, this is
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 20:01, Max Bowsher wrote:
However, the redefinition of fprintf in ini.cc, is as far as I can see,
totally unused, and can be removed.
Robert: Can you confirm this, and approve me to delete it from ini.cc ?
Well, fprintf *is* used in setup. The fprintf in ini.cc is
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Anyway, now perl is uploaded. I have removed the 'test' version.
Don't forget to send an announcement :)
The requires: line also changed in both setup.hint files, did you see?
I uploaded the setup.hint files provided on your site. And yes I've
Pavel schrieb:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Anyway, now perl is uploaded. I have removed the 'test' version.
Don't forget to send an announcement :)
The requires: line also changed in both setup.hint files, did you see?
I uploaded the setup.hint files provided on your
Earnie Boyd wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
I confirm your ICE.
Did you try -mno-fun-dllimport?
No. Overriding CFLAGS on a per-file basis isn't pretty, when using automake.
Max.
Robert Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 20:01, Max Bowsher wrote:
However, the redefinition of fprintf in ini.cc, is as far as I can see,
totally unused, and can be removed.
Robert: Can you confirm this, and approve me to delete it from ini.cc ?
Well, fprintf *is* used in setup. The
Max Bowsher wrote:
No. Overriding CFLAGS on a per-file basis isn't pretty, when using automake.
Wrap the compiler with a shell script and let it look for the file it is compiling,
and act accordingly.
--
Joe Buehler
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:31:49PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
I second par.
I'm in favor of this, too.
Ok, that makes three votes so far - I've uploaded it.
Lapo, please, send an announcement.
You have my vote for splint.
-Samrobb
Ping...
Igor
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On 26 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 02:11, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Do I need to regenerate this against HEAD once Max checks
in the postinstall thread patch?
Yes, and I'll review it then.
1. LPRng
date : 21 Jan 2003
version: 3.8.19-1
status : reviewed; source package needs to be fixed
notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00215.html
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00172.html
reviews:
Ergo, this will be a problem when the next mingw-runtime comes out.
Danny, if you have a patch for either mingw or setup, that'd be great.
Does what you are suggesting impose any limitations on setup ?
Probably simplest (for per-file override of _CRTIMP) is just to add
#define _CRTIMP
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 02:42, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Ping...
Igor
Pong.
Uhmm, try_run_script is always called with to_log true. So, why have the
parameter there at all?
Rob
--
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 06:23, Danny Smith wrote:
Ergo, this will be a problem when the next mingw-runtime comes out.
Danny, if you have a patch for either mingw or setup, that'd be great.
Does what you are suggesting impose any limitations on setup ?
Probably simplest (for per-file
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 00:52, Max Bowsher wrote:
Owww. That's horribly complicated and non-intuitive.
Any objections to rewriting the clients of weird-modified-fprintf to use the
msg.cc functions, and *then* disposing of our weird-modified-fprintf?
Yes. The clients are console routines,
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Bigger and better than ever baby YEAH!
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i NumPropPages; i++)
+ unmixed int i;
+ for (i = 0; i PropertyPages.size(); i++)
Gary, what is an unmixed int? :-)
Max.
Max Bowsher wrote:
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Bigger and better than ever baby YEAH!
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i NumPropPages; i++)
+ unmixed int i;
+ for (i = 0; i PropertyPages.size(); i++)
Gary, what is an unmixed int? :-)
Gary, and everyone, please ignore me.
I guess I should
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:53:50PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Bigger and better than ever baby YEAH!
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i NumPropPages; i++)
+ unmixed int i;
+ for (i = 0; i PropertyPages.size(); i++)
Gary, what is an unmixed int? :-)
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 08:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On 1 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 02:42, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Ping...
Igor
Pong.
Uhmm, try_run_script is always called with to_log true. So, why have the
parameter there at all?
Rob
On 1 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 08:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On 1 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
Uhmm, try_run_script is always called with to_log true. So, why have the
parameter there at all?
Rob
Umm, for symmetry? If you ever wanted to turn off
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 09:31, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Rob,
The reason I wanted to keep the to_log parameter is that I wanted to keep
the code around that directs output to console. If there are no
objections, I'll just make the default value of to_log TRUE, and remove
the third
On 1 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 09:31, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Rob,
The reason I wanted to keep the to_log parameter is that I wanted to keep
the code around that directs output to console. If there are no
objections, I'll just make the default value of
I've gotten together a new version of cygwin-doc:
http://ns1.iocc.com/~joshua/cygwin/cygwin-doc-1.3-3-src.tar.bz2
http://ns1.iocc.com/~joshua/cygwin/cygwin-doc-1.3-3.tar.bz2
No changes to setup.hint
Thanks!
I've gotten together a new version of cygwin-doc:
http://ns1.iocc.com/~joshua/cygwin/cygwin-doc-1.3-3-src.tar.bz2
http://ns1.iocc.com/~joshua/cygwin/cygwin-doc-1.3-3.tar.bz2
No changes to setup.hint
Thanks!
Here is the latest version of exim, requiring libgdbm
Pierre
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1u1tg/exim-4.14-1.tar.bz2
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1u1tg/exim-4.14-1-src.tar.bz2
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1u1tg/setup.hint
# Exim-4.14-1 setup.hint
sdesc: A Mail Transfer Agent.
ldesc: Mail
Whoops, sorry for the extra message. I forgot about time zones and decided
after 5 minutes that my email hadn't gotten through (I've been having
connectivity problems). Didn't think to look in April.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:03:22PM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
I've gotten together a
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:08:38PM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
Whoops, sorry for the extra message. I forgot about time zones and decided
after 5 minutes that my email hadn't gotten through (I've been having
connectivity problems). Didn't think to look in April.
That's ok. I uploaded
No really, this IS on topic.
Many moons ago, I grew so frustrated with the official cvs maintainers
at cvshome.com -- no updates in forever, disdainful of outside
contributions etc -- that I decided that the next release of cvs that I
made would come from the cvsnt codebase, since that was
Gary -
you sound like you're beginning to become somewhat frustrated with this
process.
Am I that transparent? ;-)
Yeah, there's definite frustration here. I'm one of those sickos that do this
sort of thing for fun. Battling over the size of a patch ain't fun. It ain't
even work - I've
Max Bowsher wrote:
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Bigger and better than ever baby YEAH!
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i NumPropPages; i++)
+ unmixed int i;
+ for (i = 0; i PropertyPages.size(); i++)
Gary, what is an unmixed int? :-)
Gary, and everyone, please ignore me.
I
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 08:36, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 18:43, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
2003-03-30 Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* cygwin.ico: Added two new resolutions, 64x64 and 72x72.
Sorry, no Cyppy. Yet. ;-)
Max, this is
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Bigger and better than ever baby YEAH!
- int i;
- for (i = 0; i NumPropPages; i++)
+ unmixed int i;
+ for (i = 0; i PropertyPages.size(); i++)
Gary, what is an unmixed int? :-)
I think it's a C99-ism. Not a moment too soon either, I hate it when my ints
Wrong list. Try [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Corinna
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:00:32AM +0200, ANTONIO.PICAZO wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone knows if there is a limitation of the number of
simultaneuos ssh connections? I have the following problem:
- I have more or less almost 100 servers that have a
Does anyone want to take on the maintainership for the new coreutils
package? This package is the accumulation of fileutils, sh-utils,
and textutils. I've made some minor modifications to fileutils
that dimly tried to handle .exe files on cp but it never worked
right. I'd gladly give up
Robert Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 20:01, Max Bowsher wrote:
However, the redefinition of fprintf in ini.cc, is as far as I can see,
totally unused, and can be removed.
Robert: Can you confirm this, and approve me to delete it from ini.cc ?
Well, fprintf *is* used in setup. The
I second par.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Max Bowsher wrote:
I confirm your ICE.
Did you try -mno-fun-dllimport?
Earnie.
42 matches
Mail list logo
