Charles Wilson wrote:
Expires today.
Yay!!!
Shall I respin libtiff to include LZW support, and distribute the new
LZW-capable libtiff via the cygwin mirror system?
I guess my libungif package is obsolete too ^_^
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available)
erm - not to rain on this ... but is it a good idea if the patent has only
expired in america?
Gareth
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: Unisys patent
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:38:28AM
I posted a reply to this earlier but it's just not my day for doing things
right. I shouldn't publicise my bad language skills, should I?! :-)
Please don't do this. From tomorrow the Unisys LZW patent will be defunct in
the US, and again a day later in Canada. That still leaves serveral
I'm about to do the include guard cleanup I mentioned some time ago.
Whilst I'm tidying up the names of the include guards, I might as well tidy
up the locations of the include guards (with respect to the comments at the
start of the file). Is this ordering OK? :
Max Bowsher wrote:
I'm about to do the include guard cleanup I mentioned some time ago.
Whilst I'm tidying up the names of the include guards, I might as well
tidy
up the locations of the include guards (with respect to the comments at
the
start of the file). Is this ordering OK? :
Max Bowsher wrote:
I'm about to do the include guard cleanup I mentioned some time ago.
Whilst I'm tidying up the names of the include guards, I might as well tidy
up the locations of the include guards (with respect to the comments at the
start of the file). Is this ordering OK? :
Elfyn McBratney wrote:
I posted a reply to this earlier but it's just not my day for doing things
right. I shouldn't publicise my bad language skills, should I?! :-)
Please don't do this. From tomorrow the Unisys LZW patent will be defunct in
the US, and again a day later in Canada. That still
Max Bowsher wrote:
Off-list (presumably accidentally), Gary R. Van Sickle replied:
I tend to think that the include guards should wrap as much of the file as
possible, idea being that the compiler then bypasses the most text
possible.
But then again, rumor has it that gcc (at least) recognizes
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Charles Wilson wrote:
Elfyn McBratney wrote:
I posted a reply to this earlier but it's just not my day for doing things
right. I shouldn't publicise my bad language skills, should I?! :-)
Please don't do this. From tomorrow the Unisys LZW patent will be defunct in
