Re: new package proposal : CLISP

2003-09-15 Thread Lapo Luchini
Christopher Faylor wrote: what do you want - a marriage contract? Well maybe Sam just thinks that being a mantainer means producing a package 12 minutes after the upstream release, solve all and all the problems right now, reply to all the mail in zero time... which being a mantainer is *not*

[RFU] bash-2.05b-15

2003-09-15 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
I've made a new release of Bash available for upload. This fixes the problem recently reported on the Cygwin mailing list using a temporary patch to config.h.in (thanks to Corinna for the pointers). Please remove the -14 from the mirrors - prev should remain -13. I'll announce it as soon as it's

Re: [RFU] bash-2.05b-15

2003-09-15 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
DO NOT UPLOAD THIS YET! I've just installed it from my mirror, and am having weird problems I didn't have when I just manually installed it. I'm investigating it now. rlc On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 12:33:25PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: I've made a new release of Bash available for

Re: [RFU] bash-2.05b-15

2003-09-15 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
Never mind the mail I just sent - it's a Setup error. (sorry for any confusion) OTOH: I ran Setup and, while it was downloading Bash, ^D-ed the last Bash instance I had running. Apparently, Bash didn't quite get installed as it was supposed to be (scared the s**t out of me) and disappeared - no

Re: [RFU] bash-2.05b-15

2003-09-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 12:33:25PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: I've made a new release of Bash available for upload. This fixes the problem recently reported on the Cygwin mailing list using a temporary patch to config.h.in (thanks to Corinna for the pointers). Please remove the

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-15 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:24:20AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: -- lame ascii art ++ | BB | -- my spiffy new Cygwin Bash Maintainer Hat ;) | AA | | SS | | HH | +-Cygwin-+ | o o | | || | \ \__/ /

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-15 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
You haven't marked them as test while gcc-3.3.1 isn't canonical yet. It won't harm (much) I think, but it might if someone wants to go ahead and develop something with libaspell.. rlc On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:53:52PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-15 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
FWIW, the dictionary files are now here: 04be855c088559b4682b5495510234fe *aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2 33fad88cd4d517596ebab42d368ba750 *aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2 http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2 I did not regenerate

Re: Aspell ... (ready?)

2003-09-15 Thread Gareth Pearce
Doh - i forgot gcc 3.3.1 is 'test' - but indeed - if theres Anyone who wants to develop with libaspell before gcc test version goes real - i think they can use the test ... no? I dont really think that aspell needs to be marked as test because of this. Gareth You haven't marked them as test

Re: new package proposal : CLISP

2003-09-15 Thread Sam Steingold
* Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-15 11:57:43 -0400]: On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Sam Steingold wrote: * Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-13 19:41:02 -0400]: this is a misunderstanding. I am maintaining this package. please do upload it. Your first act as a

Re: [ITP] sgrep-1.99.1 - new package for review

2003-09-15 Thread Jari Aalto+mail.linux
* Sun 2003-09-14 Joshua Daniel Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 02:19:17AM +0300, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote: | sgrep project from http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/jjaakkol/sgrep.html has | been ported, please review. | | I haven't reviewed, but

Re: [ITP] ploticus-2.11 - new package for review

2003-09-15 Thread Jari Aalto+mail.linux
* Sun 2003-09-14 Gary Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Here is new package. Please review. | /Jari | | http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/ploticus-2.11-1-src.tar.bz2 | http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/ploticus-2.11-1.tar.bz2 | | sdesc: Commadn line driven

Re: new package proposal : CLISP

2003-09-15 Thread Lapo Luchini
Sam Steingold wrote: Now, cygwin maintainers (like RedHat maintaners, Debian maintaners c c) want all packages to look the same _to them_. This is quite reasonable, but it puts a certain strain on me: I have to learn all sort of new stuff (setup.hint format, CYGWIN-PATCHES, *.spec, debian c c).

Re: new package proposal : CLISP

2003-09-15 Thread Sam Steingold
* Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-15 21:54:41 +0200]: Sam Steingold wrote: Now, cygwin maintainers (like RedHat maintaners, Debian maintaners c c) want all packages to look the same _to them_. This is quite reasonable, but it puts a certain strain on me: I have to learn all sort

Re: new package proposal : CLISP

2003-09-15 Thread Jari Aalto+mail.linux
* 2003-09-15 Sam Steingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.cygwin-apps * Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | * Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-15 11:57:43 -0400]: | | On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Sam Steingold wrote: | | * Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-13 19:41:02 -0400]: | |