HEADSUP maintainers of: links mod_php4 mod_ssl mutt wget

2003-10-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
The following packages should be updated ASAP: Package Maintainer -- links Sami Tikka mod_php4 Stipe Tolj mod_ssl Stipe Tolj mutt Gary R. Van Sickle wget Hack Kampbjorn They are still relying on OpenSSL-0.9.6.

Re: new packages mhash/mhash-devel ready for upload

2003-10-01 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Hetzl wrote: | http://stud3.tuwien.ac.at/~e9925353/cygwin/release/mhash/setup.hint Seems good, except that for personal taste I would remove the ^the in the runtime environment of the mhash library |

Who is Cygwin's readline maintainer?

2003-10-01 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
There is a test version (5.0-alpha) of readline on which the test version (3.0-alpha) os Bash depends. As I'm having a wee bit of trouble with readline (building it, for the moment) I'd like to coordinate my efforts with Cygwin's readline maintainer but I don't know who he/she is.. ping? rlc

RE: HEADSUP maintainers of: links mod_php4 mod_ssl mutt wget

2003-10-01 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
Just gotta get the #*(@# Muttrc installing, which is giving me fits, and the new mutt is set. Muttrc is where the incorrect /usr/local/whatever/manual.txt is coming from. If we could ignore that problem I'm ready to go now AFAIK. -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer. Patriot. -Original

[ITP] d 1.2.0

2003-10-01 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would like to propose packaging 'd' for Cygwin distribution. 'd' is an alternative to ls -l (see setup.hint), released under the GPL. The current and previous versions have built OOTB under Cygwin 1.3.x and 1.5.x with both GCC 3.2-x and 3.3.1.

Re: HEADSUP maintainers of: links mod_php4 mod_ssl mutt wget

2003-10-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:16:10AM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: Just gotta get the #*(@# Muttrc installing, which is giving me fits, and the new mutt is set. Muttrc is where the incorrect /usr/local/whatever/manual.txt is coming from. If we could ignore that problem I'm ready to go now

Re: [ITP] d 1.2.0

2003-10-01 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
Ehm.. how is this really different from: alias d='ls -l' ? rlc On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:58:03AM -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would like to propose packaging 'd' for Cygwin distribution. 'd' is an alternative to ls -l (see setup.hint),

Re: [ITP] d 1.2.0

2003-10-01 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hello Yaakov, http://mywebpage.netscape.com/yselkowitz/cygwin/d/d-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2 http://mywebpage.netscape.com/yselkowitz/cygwin/d/d-1.2.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://mywebpage.netscape.com/yselkowitz/cygwin/d/setup.hint category: Utils requires: cygwin sdesc: The Directory Lister ldesc: The

Re: [ITP] d 1.2.0

2003-10-01 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 rlc wrote: Ehm.. how is this really different from: alias d='ls -l' ? Quite a bit, really. The canonical homepage does a good job of describing the differences, which is: http://pages.xtn.net/~ecogburn/d.html In addition, in Cygwin on Win2K, d

Re: [ITP] d 1.2.0

2003-10-01 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit P. Haase wrote: I vote pro. Review: Binary is not stripped: Thanks for catching that one. I've built this so many times now, but it slipped by me anyway. I've fixed this and uploaded a new binary package. Else the binary package

Re: libungif next release

2003-10-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:19:29PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I received a couple of upgrade requests, and I discovered a full nest of bees: while the package dates 1999 there are lots of patches available. IMHO the best thing would be to base

Re: [ITP] d 1.2.0

2003-10-01 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit P. Haase wrote: | This is exactly how I have built this package every time (except | the first time I did make install instead of make install-strip), | without calling any options. I have remade the source package also | and have just

Re: [ITP] d 1.2.0

2003-10-01 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:42:23PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: Ehm.. how is this really different from: alias d='ls -l' ? My question, too. Do we need two packages to do the same thing when 99.9% of the cygwin users are just going to be doing 'ls -l'? cgf

libungif-4.1.0b1-1 [Was: libungif next release]

2003-10-01 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Igor Pechtchanski wrote: | Neither did jgraph's. I fixed it by changing the conf function | in the script to just copy the files over to the build directory... | Another alternative is to make symlinks, but that required more work. | ;-) Mhh, this

Re: Who is Cygwin's readline maintainer?

2003-10-01 Thread Charles Wilson
Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: There is a test version (5.0-alpha) of readline on which the test version (3.0-alpha) os Bash depends. As I'm having a wee bit of trouble with readline (building it, for the moment) I'd like to coordinate my efforts with Cygwin's readline maintainer but I don't

please review: libmcrypt-2.5.7-1, libmcrypt-devel-2.5.7-1

2003-10-01 Thread Stefan Hetzl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I have created cygwin packages for libmcrypt version 2.5.7. For these packages I used method 2 and tried to stick as closely to it as possible. If the packages are ok, please upload them. libmcrypt-2.5.7-1:

Re: please review: libmcrypt-2.5.7-1, libmcrypt-devel-2.5.7-1

2003-10-01 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Hetzl wrote: | I have created cygwin packages for libmcrypt version 2.5.7. For these | packages I used method 2 and tried to stick as closely to it as | possible. Seems good to me. - -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys

Re: libungif-4.1.0b1-1 [Was: libungif next release]

2003-10-01 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Lapo Luchini wrote: http://www.lapo.it/tmp/libungif-4.1.0b1-1.tar.bz2 It'd be nice to have all /usr/bin binaries in another package. And there's no dll ? BTW, are /usr/share/doc/libungif-4.1.0b1/Makefile.{am,in} required ? -- How to contact me -

Re: libungif-4.1.0b1-1 [Was: libungif next release]

2003-10-01 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote: | It'd be nice to have all /usr/bin binaries in another package. On such small packages I don't think it realyl necessary, but if there is people that would like it, then I guess there are others too. Look for -2 soon. |

Re: new packages mhash/mhash-devel ready for upload

2003-10-01 Thread Stefan Hetzl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I have uploaded new packages with the following modifications: *) removed leading the in sdesc (see Lapo's mail) *) moved documentation from /usr/doc into /usr/share/doc (see Lapo's mail) *) added /usr/lib/libmhash.la to devel package (after