Morrison, John wrote:
2.11.1 has just been released...
Original from http://distcc.samba.org
This is a first attempt. It still needs quite a lot of setup to
use. I'm working on the postinstall which will do more of the work,
but I thought this might be of use to some folk as it stands.
Igor wrote about:
http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/antiword-0.34-1-src.tar.bz2
http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/antiword-0.34-1.tar.bz2
http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/setup.hint
[...]
One small problem I noticed (and this may be an upstream one) is that I'm
getting a
On 2003-10-08T12:33+0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
) Otherwise the package is good to go, IMO.
) Igor
) Hey, Daniel, there were three votes and a positive review, lets push it
) on the mirrors;-)
Just went to push and the last check didn't find a Cygwin-specific README.
Looks like the
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Igor wrote about:
http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/antiword-0.34-1-src.tar.bz2
http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/antiword-0.34-1.tar.bz2
http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/antiword/setup.hint
[...]
One small problem I noticed (and this
Hi Igor,
One small problem I noticed (and this may be an upstream one) is that I'm
getting a Syntax error in: '0x98 #UNDEFINED' error when viewing a Word97
file with the cp1251.txt mapping. The document then displays ok.
A grep UNDEFINED *.txt in usr/share/antiword shows
cp1250.txt:0x81
I am not sure I understand what test has to do with prev and curr.
The way I look at prev and curr is that if someone upgrades to the
current cmake, but there is a compatibility problem with their project,
then can go back to prev. Unless I am missing something if I leave
it the way it is, then
2.11.1 has just been released...
Original from http://distcc.samba.org
This is a first attempt. It still needs quite a lot of setup to
use. I'm working on the postinstall which will do more of the work,
but I thought this might be of use to some folk as it stands.
J.
sdesc: A fast,
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:35:56AM -0400, William A. Hoffman wrote:
1.6.7-2 was the test release for cygwin 1.5.x. It was never
made the current release for cmake. I suppose we could go
either way. The only difference between 1.6.7-1 and 1.6.7-2 is
that one is built with cygwin 1.3.x and
I'm suggesting you remove prev and curr from setup.hint altogether,
and keep whichever version you'd like as prev. upset should be smart
enough to figure out which version is prev and which is curr.
Igor
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, William A. Hoffman wrote:
I am not sure I understand what test
We just tried installing prev from setup, and it worked fine on
a cygwin 1.5.x machine. So, we are going to leave it the way it
is. You can remove 1.6.7-2 if you want.
I will go ahead and announce cmake 1.8.1-1 release in a few hours.
Thanks.
-Bill
It's your decision. Changing the
On 2003-10-08T11:58-0400, William A. Hoffman wrote:
) We just tried installing prev from setup, and it worked fine on
) a cygwin 1.5.x machine. So, we are going to leave it the way it
) is. You can remove 1.6.7-2 if you want.
Done. I have removed cmake-1.6.7-2.
-rw-r--r--1 546 Oct 8
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:33:06PM -0400, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-10-08T11:58-0400, William A. Hoffman wrote:
) We just tried installing prev from setup, and it worked fine on
) a cygwin 1.5.x machine. So, we are going to leave it the way it
) is. You can remove 1.6.7-2 if you want.
No, I have not. I will remove them when 1.8.2-1 comes out if that
is OK.
-Bill
At 12:38 PM 10/8/2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:33:06PM -0400, Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2003-10-08T11:58-0400, William A. Hoffman wrote:
) We just tried installing prev from setup, and it
On 2003-10-08T18:38+0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
) On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:33:06PM -0400, Daniel Reed wrote:
) On 2003-10-08T11:58-0400, William A. Hoffman wrote:
) ) We just tried installing prev from setup, and it worked fine on
) ) a cygwin 1.5.x machine. So, we are going to leave it
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:05:23PM -0400, William A. Hoffman wrote:
No, I have not. I will remove them when 1.8.2-1 comes out if that
is OK.
Actually I asked Daniel :-)
Corinna
-Bill
At 12:38 PM 10/8/2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:33:06PM -0400, Daniel Reed
This is the list of pending packages as of Wednesday, October 8, 2003.
** PACKAGE PROPOSERS ** Please verify these fields **
Package: The name and version of the package as it will appear in setup.
Proposal: Files that will be uploaded to sources.redhat.com unmodified.
HOLD-UPS: What you need
I support inclusion of libsigsegv into cygwin.
--
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
http://www.camera.org http://www.iris.org.il http://www.memri.org/
http://www.mideasttruth.com/ http://www.honestreporting.com
When you are arguing with an idiot, your opponent is doing the
Hallo,
Today I saw the following: setup.exe runs to install several packages,
it stucks and I saw that there was no space left at the hardisk. I
clicked on the 'Abbrechen' (probably 'Exit' or 'Finish' in english)
button, and started to delete all entries in the /usr/doc, man, info,
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 06:53, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hallo,
That was with the
setup.exe version I checked out today from mirrors.rcn.net.
Which could be any version. What was the version number?
Also, your best bet to fix this is to build a debug version and break
into in when this happens.
On 08.10.2003 20:56, Daniel Reed wrote:
===
Pending Packages List
===
Waiting for review: tcm ploticus sgrep libsigsegv suite3270 distcc
Waiting for vote[s]: ploticus sgrep
Daniel Reed wrote:
ITP: graphviz
HOLD-UPS: Not enough votes (need 2 more). No package, nothing to review!
I use it to create GPG trust relationsships graphs.. I guess it wuold be
handy to have on (standard) Cygwin.
Aye.
ITP: subversion 0.30-1
HOLD-UPS: Not enough votes (need 2 more). No
Daniel Reed wrote:
ITP: graphviz
HOLD-UPS: Not enough votes (need 2 more). No package, nothing to
review!
I use it to create GPG trust relationsships graphs.. I guess it wuold be
handy to have on (standard) Cygwin.
Aye.
Additional hold-ups for this one should include - no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerrit wrote:
Another question, d shows the timestamps in GMT, not respecting my
local TZ settings as ls does, can this be configured? (I haven't
studied the docs completly yet, so forgive me if it is included
there):
I passed this on to the
23 matches
Mail list logo
