Re: fltk-1.1.4-1: take 2

2003-10-18 Thread Nicholas Wourms
wrote: Nicolas wrote: First off, you have /usr/share/doc/fltk & /usr/share/doc/fltk-1.1.4. Done Second, where are the include files? Building fltk apps will definitely need those. yep, included now Third, you can ditch /etc/postinstall since you aren't using a script. Done On the subj

Re: New package: fltk

2003-10-18 Thread Daniel Reed
On 2003-10-15T21:35+0200, A.R. Burgers wrote: ) I'd like to propose a new package, fltk-1.1.4. ) The fltk homepage is at http://www.fltk.org/ ) ) These are the URL's of binary and source tarballs: ) ) http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/fltk-1.1.4-1.tar.bz2 ) http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/priv

Re: OTcl, TclCL, ns, nam

2003-10-18 Thread Daniel Reed
On 2003-10-18T22:58+0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: ) > I will need to start with packaging OTcl and TclCL before moving on to ) > ns and Nam. ) This sounds great! Though I guess it will be a lot of work to get the ) TCL parts running. Anyway, go ahead! Is that a vote for the package? :) -- Danie

Re: OTcl, TclCL, ns, nam

2003-10-18 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Harold, > http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~christin/ns-cygwin.shtml > I will need to start with packaging OTcl and TclCL before moving on to > ns and Nam. > Any comments? This sounds great! Though I guess it will be a lot of work to get the TCL parts running. Anyway, go ahead! Gerrit

Re: New package: fltk

2003-10-18 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Teun, Am Samstag, 18. Oktober 2003 um 21:36 schriebst du: > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >> Ok, here we go, I used these Makefiles to build dynamic libraries linked >>against X. You may also integrate the changes into the usual >>Makefile templates, but I used these handcrafted files. I used

Re: fltk-1.1.4-1: take 2

2003-10-18 Thread Teun Burgers
Daniel Reed wrote: Looks like there may be a problem in the binary file, tar -jtvvf is yelling at me: Fixed now. Something must have gone wrong during upload Teun

Re: fltk-1.1.4-1: take 2

2003-10-18 Thread Daniel Reed
On 2003-10-18T21:30+0200, Teun Burgers wrote: ) I've uploaded a new version of fltk-1.1.4 source- and binary packages. ) ) http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/fltk-1.1.4-1.tar.bz2 ) http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/fltk-1.1.4-1-src.tar.bz2 Looks like there may be a problem in th

[ITP] OTcl, TclCL, ns, nam

2003-10-18 Thread Harold L Hunt II
[After the disaster that was my attempt to package cweb, I figured I will ask some questions before wasting time packaging something that is already available.] I am intending to package "The Network Simulator - ns-2": = http://www.isi.edu/

Re: cweb 3.0

2003-10-18 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Gerrit, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: And I have some questions for you: - From your link to the CWEB homepage I came to the ftp which distributes CWEB and I see the latest is 3.64, where yours is 3.0: ftp://labrea.stanford.edu/pub/cweb/cweb-3.64.tar.gz - IIRC CWEB is already included in the TeX pa

Re: cweb 3.0

2003-10-18 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Harold, > Original from http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/cweb.html I cannot answer your questions, sorry. > Initial version of package files > > http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/cygwin/cweb/setup.hint (1 KiB) > http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/cygwin/cweb/

Re: New package: fltk

2003-10-18 Thread Teun Burgers
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Ok, here we go, I used these Makefiles to build dynamic libraries linked against X. You may also integrate the changes into the usual Makefile templates, but I used these handcrafted files. I used them with fltk-1.1.4rc1, so there may be some additional problems with the

fltk-1.1.4-1: take 2

2003-10-18 Thread Teun Burgers
I've uploaded a new version of fltk-1.1.4 source- and binary packages. http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/fltk-1.1.4-1.tar.bz2 http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/fltk-1.1.4-1-src.tar.bz2 A good review was made by Nicholas in: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-10/msg002

[ITP] cweb 3.0

2003-10-18 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Original from http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/cweb.html Questions for other maintainters 1) tex - cweb wants to dump a macro file (cwebmac.tex) in the following directory: /usr/local/lib/tex/inputs I can't find the corresponding location under /usr/shar

Re: Pending Packages List, 2003-10-17

2003-10-18 Thread Charles Wilson
Corinna Vinschen wrote: I don't think so. The X11 packages are prefixed to /usr/X11 entirely. Ther's no need to move stuff from /usr/X11R6/share to /usr/share. I agree with Corinna: almost everything in an X11 package should be in the /usr/X11R6 heirarchy. The exceptions being: /etc/X11 stuff,

Re: Pending Packages List, 2003-10-17

2003-10-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 02:31:34PM -0400, Daniel Reed wrote: > On 2003-10-17T19:34+0200, Daniel Boesswetter wrote: > ) >Package: tcm 2.20-1 > ) >Description: Toolkit for Conceptual Modeling (TCM) > ) > Proposer: Daniel Boesswetter > ) > Proposal: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01