Volker,
I tried to build the package and got the following from the "prep" step:
aclocal: configure.ac: 46: macro `AM_ICONV' not found in library
I have updated all of my packages to the latest "curr" releases. Were
you setting a non-default PKG_CONFIG_PATH before running the script?
Here is
> I'm going to create a 3.3.2 branch for gcc, ok?
>
> Danny could you do your magic to the branch? Or would it
> make better sense to just merge the changes from 3.3.1 -> 3.3.2
> into the current branch?
I think the latter might be safer. My local version has some
mingw-specific anon-mmap st
On 2003-11-12T15:30-0500, Andre Bleau wrote:
) I've prepared new binary and source tarballs for the OpenGL package. You
) can upload them from the folloing URLs:
)
) ftp://orbite.chumontreal.qc.ca/OpenGL/setup.hint
) ftp://orbite.chumontreal.qc.ca/OpenGL/opengl-1.1.0-7.tar.bz2
) ftp://orbite.chumon
Hi there,
I've prepared new binary and source tarballs for the OpenGL package. You
can upload them from the folloing URLs:
ftp://orbite.chumontreal.qc.ca/OpenGL/setup.hint
ftp://orbite.chumontreal.qc.ca/OpenGL/opengl-1.1.0-7.tar.bz2
ftp://orbite.chumontreal.qc.ca/OpenGL/opengl-1.1.0-7-src.tar.bz
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:32:06AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > [snip]
> > Another question is this:
> >
> > Should we actually depend on creating an NT account called "root"?
> > This might be already in use by a bunch of users and sysadmins
On 2003-11-12T09:17-0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
) I vote pro as well.
)
) I guess the only thing that needs to happen now is a package review, right?
That is correct.
Package: gd 2.0.15-1
Status: Attained required 3 votes. Package available.
HOLD-UPS: No "good to go" review.
--
Daniel
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> [snip]
> Another question is this:
>
> Should we actually depend on creating an NT account called "root"?
> This might be already in use by a bunch of users and sysadmins just
> for fun. Probably we do more often collide with that than we like.
>
> W
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:21:21PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> What about using a less common name like, say "cygwin_root" or
> "cygsrv_root" or so.
... which would get the name "root" in /etc/passwd, nevertheless,
like this:
root:unused_by_nt/2000/xp:0:0:Cygwin root
account,U-WINBOX\cygwin
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 03:44:44PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:29:08PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > Eh, no. I was thinking about a postinstall script, which checks for
> > > Everyone (S-1-0-0) in /etc/passwd and /etc/group and remov
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:54:17AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> At 12:33 PM 11/12/2003 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >I don't understand the "that was done with Windows 2003 in mind".
> >Setting the uid to 18 in exim seems counterproductive in that environment.
>
> The problem I was addres
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:29:08PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Eh, no. I was thinking about a postinstall script, which checks for
> > Everyone (S-1-0-0) in /etc/passwd and /etc/group and removes these
> > entries silently. The same script could add the "root" entry
I vote pro as well.
I guess the only thing that needs to happen now is a package review, right?
Harold
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
I would like to contribute and maintain the gd package:
I vote pro, it can be used by mod_php, too.
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
At 12:33 PM 11/12/2003 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:37:33AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> At 10:56 AM 11/12/2003 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:22:50PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> >> It autodetects if it is privileged and, if
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:25:21AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:22:50PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
At 05:58 PM 11/11/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> What about generating a root group with mkgroup -l by defau
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:34:37PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Eh, no. I was thinking about a postinstall script, which checks for
> Everyone (S-1-0-0) in /etc/passwd and /etc/group and removes these
Sorry, it's S-1-1-0. S-1-0-0 is the NULL SID.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:25:21AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:22:50PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> >> At 05:58 PM 11/11/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> >>> What about generating a root group with mkgroup -l by default?
> >>>
> >>> root:S-1-
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:37:33AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> At 10:56 AM 11/12/2003 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:22:50PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> >> It autodetects if it is privileged and, if so, setgid(544) & setuid(18)
> >> to normalize its environ
At 10:56 AM 11/12/2003 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:22:50PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> This indeterminacy might cause headaches during the transition period,
>> it's hard to foresee all ramifications.
>
>I'm running my system for at least a year with two group
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:22:50PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> At 05:58 PM 11/11/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>>> What about generating a root group with mkgroup -l by default?
>>>
>>> root:S-1-5-32-544:0:
>>>
>>> The question is then, should it *also* generate an admi
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:22:50PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> At 05:58 PM 11/11/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> >What about generating a root group with mkgroup -l by default?
> >
> > root:S-1-5-32-544:0:
> >
> >The question is then, should it *also* generate an administrators entry
> >
> > Admin
If a vote for gd is a vote towards gnuplot, you have my vote.
>
> I would like to contribute and maintain the gd package:
>
> * http://www.boutell.com/gd/ (Homepage)
> * http://www.boutell.com/gd/http/ (Download location)
>
> My goal is to contribute the gnuplot package
>
> * http://
Hi
I would like to contribute and maintain the gd package:
* http://www.boutell.com/gd/ (Homepage)
* http://www.boutell.com/gd/http/ (Download location)
My goal is to contribute the gnuplot package
* http://gnuplot.info/
which uses the gd library.
Ciao
Volker
--
Here are the se
23 matches
Mail list logo