Hallo Rafael,
I vote pro this package;)
Am Montag, 29. Dezember 2003 um 00:26 schriebst du:
Happy New Year everyone!
The files:
http://www.io.com/~rkitover/libwin32-perl-0.191/
The package is installable by pointing setup.exe to above URL, selecting
the exp checkbox and looking under
On 2003-12-22T11:05-0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
) On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
) There is a bug in the naim-0.11.6.4-1-src.tar.bz2 source tarball on the
) mirrors: the build script is not executable in the tar file. No biggie,
) as it could easily be chmod'ed, but this
Hallo Rafael,
4. The build option the second time runs until this error stops the
build:
gcc -c -DPERL_USE_SAFE_PUTENV -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-DUSEIMPORTLIB -O2 -DVERSION=\0.09\ -DXS_VERSION=\0.09\
-I/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.2/cygwin-thread-multi-64int/CORE Net.c
Net.xs:9:22:
Hallo Rafael,
4. The build option the second time runs until this error stops the
build:
gcc -c -DPERL_USE_SAFE_PUTENV -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-DUSEIMPORTLIB -O2 -DVERSION=\0.09\ -DXS_VERSION=\0.09\
-I/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.2/cygwin-thread-multi-64int/CORE Net.c
Net.xs:9:22:
On 2003-12-23T14:03-0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
) I'll try to contact him again privately, but if he doesn't respond
) mid-January we should probably drop his ITPs from the PPL.
As far as technical capabilities go, I can hide them from the PPL without
losing all of the votes, reviews, etc.
Hi Gerrit,
Thanks so much for testing my package! What a mess :)
I'll take care of these issues:
* empty /etc/postinstall (also package should probably not list
directories unless they are actually created).
* change install path to:
rkitover wrote:
Hi Gerrit,
Thanks so much for testing my package! What a mess :)
Gerrit,
Now that it seems we'll be providing perl module packages, I think we
should come up with some sort of naming standard for consistency. For
example, Red Hat prefixes their perl packages with perl- and
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
rkitover wrote:
Hi Gerrit,
Thanks so much for testing my package! What a mess :)
Gerrit,
Now that it seems we'll be providing perl module packages, I think we
should come up with some sort of naming standard for consistency. For
example,
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Wourms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 5:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Gerrit P. Haase'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libwin32-perl-0.191 (ready for upload and testing)
Now that it seems we'll be providing perl module
