>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Charles Wilson
>Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 6:35 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Pending Packages List, 2004-01-23
>
>Rafael Kitover wrote:
>> I got Locale::gettext packaged here:
>>
>> http://
Rafael Kitover wrote:
I got Locale::gettext packaged here:
http://www.io.com/~rkitover/perl-gettext-1.01-1-src.tar.bz2
If anyone wants to maintain it, just put your name into the README and send out
an ITP...
If not, and it seems to be a good idea to anyone, I'll maintain it I guess :)
Danger,
I got Locale::gettext packaged here:
http://www.io.com/~rkitover/perl-gettext-1.01-1-src.tar.bz2
If anyone wants to maintain it, just put your name into the README and send out
an ITP...
If not, and it seems to be a good idea to anyone, I'll maintain it I guess :)
--
Rafael
>-Original Me
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Andreas Seidl wrote:
> As said in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-01/msg00112.html the
> version is now 1.6-2, please change the package and the file names:
>
> >Package: ccrypt 1.6-1 [2003-12-14]
>
> >http://alice.fmi.uni-passau.de/~seidl/cygwin/release/ccrypt/ccrypt-1
As said in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-01/msg00112.html the
version is now 1.6-2, please change the package and the file names:
Package: ccrypt 1.6-1 [2003-12-14]
http://alice.fmi.uni-passau.de/~seidl/cygwin/release/ccrypt/ccrypt-1.6-1.tar.bz2
http://alice.fmi.uni-passau.de/~seidl/cygw
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
> See http://boxes.thomasjensen.com/
>
> Packages available for review:
>
> http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/boxes/boxes-2000.0401-1-src.tar.bz2
> http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/boxes/boxes-2000.0401-1.tar.bz2
> http://tierra.dyndns.org
See http://boxes.thomasjensen.com/
Packages available for review:
http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/boxes/boxes-2000.0401-1-src.tar.bz2
http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/boxes/boxes-2000.0401-1.tar.bz2
http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/boxes/setup.hint
To download:
wget -q -O - ht
wrote:
Please don't: we already have a perfectly good iconv implementation in the
distribution and there's no law against providing iconv as a separate library
from the kernel/libc/whatnot.
Of course it isn't "against" the law, but the fact is that most modern,
non-microsoft, libc's provide it.
Please don't: we already have a perfectly good iconv implementation in the
distribution and there's no law against providing iconv as a separate library
from the kernel/libc/whatnot. By far most applications don't care too much
about transcoding, so most applications would simply have to carry aro
