Stipe,
When apache was pulled from the distribution, all the mod_* packages went
with it. AFAICS, only apache was re-released. Are you planning to update
the mod_* packages as well? IIRC, they were "mod_auth_mysql",
"mod_auth_ntsec", "mod_dav", "mod_php4", and "mod_ssl".
Igor
--
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I am wondering if we should have some different voting rules, too. I
have previously gone on record as thinking that the three vote rule
is too easy. Maybe we need a representative council or something.
I'd like to point out that people who start to think about contri
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 01:59:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>|I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding
>|issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues
>|are addressed or the package is withdrawn.
>
>I understand y
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> | I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding
> | issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues
> | are addressed or the package is withdrawn.
> | Igor
>
> I understan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
| I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding
| issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues
| are addressed or the package is withdrawn.
| Igor
I understand your thinkin
To help clean up the ITP list, I've been working on this for a while. It
is possible to get something which mostly works by simply compiling
everything under cygwin (and this is actually how the offical windows
distribution works). There are however quite a large number of
additional libraries
