emacs 21.2-13 available

2004-03-16 Thread Joe Buehler
I haven't uploaded anything in a while so please let me know if there are any new requirements on the part of Cygwin package maintainers or packages... New GNU emacs package files are available at: http://68.98.176.216:3000/cygwin/emacs-21.2-13/emacs-21.2-13-src.tar.bz2

RE: Pending Packages List, 2004-03-13

2004-03-16 Thread John Morrison
From: Christopher Faylor On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 01:59:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Igor Pechtchanski wrote: |I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding |issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues |are addressed or the package is

Re: Pending Packages List, 2004-03-13

2004-03-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:36:43PM -, John Morrison wrote: From: Christopher Faylor I don't know. I think I like Igor's more draconian approach better. I might even go so far as to say that there should be only one ITP at a time unless there is a demonstrated need for other interrelated

Re: Pending PPL

2004-03-16 Thread Daniel Reed
On 2004-03-12T11:12-0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: ) On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:38:40AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: ) FYI, I'm still working on the PPL, but doing it properly is taking more ) time than I anticipated. I now appreciate Dan's efforts even more... :-) ) The PPL *is* coming, just

Re: libungif - Depends on obsolete X libraries - Rebuild for approval by maintainer

2004-03-16 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Lapo Luchini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Harold L Hunt II wrote: I am posting this for review by Lapo, the current maintainer of libungif. If Lapo approves, I will upload this ASAP. I'm packagin' 4.1.1, but in the meantime feel free to upload this one (that seems to

[Un-ITP] ns, octl, tclcl [Was: Pending Packages List, 2004-03-13]

2004-03-16 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Package: otcl 1.0.9-1 [2003-10-29] Description: OTcl, short for MIT Object Tcl. (main package) Also: libotcl0 [OTcl, short for MIT Object Tcl. (runtime)] Also: libotcl-devel [OTcl, short for MIT Object Tcl. (development)] Proposal:

Heads Up: Cygwin/X no longer dependent on cygipc

2004-03-16 Thread Harold L Hunt II
I recompiled and posted a new build of the Cygwin/X package that were previously dependent on cygipc against cygserver instead. All setup.hint files for Cygwin/X packages and other X packages maintained by myself (not requiring a rebuild) have been updated to no longer require cygipc. I

xemacs - Package problem?

2004-03-16 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Correct me if I am wrong, but the 'xemacs' package is including the following file: /usr/bin/xemacs-21.4.15-4036492d.dmp (2855 KiB) It seems that this is nothing more than a crash dump file and that it mistakenly in the binary package file. Is that correct? If so, it should shave a

Re: Heads Up: cygwin/X no longer dependent on cygipc

2004-03-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 11:05:10PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote: I recompiled and posted a new build of the Cygwin/X package that were previously dependent on cygipc against cygserver instead. All setup.hint files for Cygwin/X packages and other X packages maintained by myself (not requiring

Re: xemacs - Package problem?

2004-03-16 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Hmm... definitely not a crash dump file Sorry for the noise. Harold Harold L Hunt II wrote: Correct me if I am wrong, but the 'xemacs' package is including the following file: /usr/bin/xemacs-21.4.15-4036492d.dmp (2855 KiB) It seems that this is nothing more than a crash dump file and that

Re: Heads Up: cygwin/X no longer dependent on cygipc

2004-03-16 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 11:05:10PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote: I recompiled and posted a new build of the Cygwin/X package that were previously dependent on cygipc against cygserver instead. All setup.hint files for Cygwin/X packages and other X packages

Re: xemacs - Package problem?

2004-03-16 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Harold == Harold L Hunt writes: Harold Hmm... definitely not a crash dump file You got it :-) Harold Harold Ciao Volker

Re: Heads Up: cygwin/X no longer dependent on cygipc

2004-03-16 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Christopher == Christopher Faylor writes: Others need to update setup.hint's for (no rebuild required): *** gd *** libgd-devel *** libgd2 *** gnuplot *** gv *** xemacs I think these are all mine ... Christopher I find it hard to believe that all of the

Re: Heads Up: cygwin/X no longer dependent on cygipc

2004-03-16 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Dr. Volker Zell wrote: Christopher == Christopher Faylor writes: Others need to update setup.hint's for (no rebuild required): *** gd *** libgd-devel *** libgd2 *** gnuplot *** gv *** xemacs I think these are all mine ... Okay. Christopher I find it hard