> I would appreciate further voting and/or reviewing to get this editor
> which works fine under cygwin into the distribution.
OK this is a +1 vote and it does indeed work fine. However, there are
a couple of packaging issues.
*you have the files named mined-2000.9{,-src}.tar.bz2 while Cygwin
pac
> I would appreciate further voting and/or reviewing to get this editor
> which works fine under cygwin into the distribution.
As others have noted, unfortunately the best way is to bug the list.
I'm afraid that personally I am using Linux more and more and so doing
fewer reviews, but I have a few
On 2004-06-10T10:15-0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
) ( BTW, what's the story with the PPL's??? I haven't got any response to
) my questions about this. Is everyone in charge of tracking their own
) ITPs now, like Gerrit has done? )
There are still some design details that need to be worked out fo
> Gerrit P Haase writes:
> Hello All,
> my pending ITP summary 2. update:
> Still not enough votes:
+1 for all
Ciao
Volker
> Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
> I would like to contribute audiofile to the Cygwin net distro. This is
> a prereq for esound, which is needed by libgnome-2.
+1
Ciao
Volker
> Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
> I would like to contribute esound to the Cygwin net distro. This is a
> requirment for libgnome-2, but it requires only libaudiofile0 (which I'm
> ITP'ing concurrently).
+1
Ciao
Volker
On Jun 10 19:35, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Not that I'm complaining -- I'm just re-iterating cgf's point: not every
> ITP'ed package makes it into the distro; even from long-time maintainers.
But you now have a chance ;-)
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding
