My ITPs update: reviews needed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I currently have two ITPs pending from 09 June, audiofile and esound; each has three votes (cgf, Harold L Hunt II, Dr. Volker Zell), but neither have been reviewed. audiofile is a prereq for esound, which is a libgnome-2 dependency. These packages can

Re: [ITP] (audiofile, libaudiofile0, libaudiofile-devel)-0.2.6-1

Hi Yaakov, > I would like to contribute audiofile to the Cygwin net distro. This is > a prereq for esound, which is needed by libgnome-2. cool, I vote pro this package (of course;). Gerrit -- =^..^=

Re: [ITP] (esound, libesound0, libesound-devel)-0.2.34-1

Hi Yaakov, > I would like to contribute esound to the Cygwin net distro. This is a > requirment for libgnome-2, but it requires only libaudiofile0 (which I'm > ITP'ing concurrently). cool, I vote pro this package too (of course;). Gerrit -- =^..^=

Re: [ITP] glib-2.4.2-1

Hi Christopher, >>I think "category: Libs Devel" is more appropriate here, if you don't >>make GNOME2-* categories. > Ditto about the Devel. It does need to be added. Ok. Gerrit -- =^..^=

Re: [ITP] glib-2.4.2-1

Hi Yaakov, > | http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/glib_devel-2.4.2-1.tar.bz2 > ~ ^ > | http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/glib_doc-2.4.2-1.tar.bz2 > ~ ^ > Shouldn't these be glib-devel and glib-doc with a hyph

Re: My pending ITPs 2. update

Hi David, many thanks for the review! Notes below. >> Package: libwmf-0.2.8.3-1 >> >> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-06/msg00058.html >> Votes : 2 >> From : David >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This works for me. > I have downloade

Re: [ITP] glib-2.4.2-1

Yaakov schrieb: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > | I want to contribute/maintain glib. > | Canonical website: http://www.gtk.org/ > I'm sorry I'm nit-picking on this one, but I think this is one package > which is VERY important to get right, being th

Re: Gnome versioning issues [was Re: [ITP] glib-2.4.2-1]

Hi Yaakov, > My vote: 'glib2' and 'gtk2'. I prefer this too. I'll change the script to reflect this. Gerrit -- =^..^=

gtk-docs path (was: Re: [ITP] glib-2.4.2-1)

Hi All, Yaakov wrote: > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > | I want to contribute/maintain glib. > | Canonical website: http://www.gtk.org/ > I'm sorry I'm nit-picking on this one, but I think this is one package > which is VERY important to get right, being that it's the foundation of > getting GNOME 2

[Good To Go] audiofile-0.2.6-1

> Yaakov Selkowitz writes: > http://cygwin-ports.sourceforge.net/install/release/audiofile/audiofile-0.2.6-1-src.tar.bz2 > http://cygwin-ports.sourceforge.net/install/release/audiofile/audiofile-0.2.6-1.tar.bz2 > http://cygwin-ports.sourceforge.net/install/release/audiofile/setup

Re: [Good To Go] audiofile-0.2.6-1

Hello Volker, > PS: Instead of the mega patch you could simple copy > /usr/autotool/devel/bin/libtool to objdir if you have it installed. I don't like this way very much, I do always a complete reconfigure (autoreconf --install --verbose --force) if possible. I.e. I use automake-1.8.5 and

[ITP-2] glib-2.4.2-1

Hello, I want to contribute/maintain glib. Canonical website: http://www.gtk.org/ Renamed & repackaged tarballs: http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/glib2-2.4.2-1.tar.bz2 http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/setup.hint http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/glib2-devel-2.4.2-1.tar.bz2 http://anfa

Re: [ITP-2] glib-2.4.2-1

Gerrit wrote: > Hello, > I want to contribute/maintain glib. > Canonical website: http://www.gtk.org/ > Renamed & repackaged tarballs: [...] > Devel package setup.hint: > === > category: Libs Devel > requires: glib > sdesc: "headers and import libraries for glib" This reads actually: category:

Re: [HEADSUP] A new policy. First victim: Gerrit

Hi Corinna, > For a start, we (cgf and I, that is) grant Gerrit the right, to add new > package to the Cygwin net distro without review and by just getting one > vote, if nobody else vetos the package within a week. Wow, thanks! > As a small payback it would be nice from you, Gerrit, to review

[ITP] atk-1.6.1-1

Hello, I want to contribute/maintain ATK. Canonical website: http://www.gtk.org/ Runtime package setup.hint: === category: Libs Devel requires: cygwin libiconv2 libintl2 glib2 sdesc: "low-level core library - runtime library" ldesc: "ATK is the low-level core library that forms the basis of GTK

[ITP] libcroco-0.5.1-1

Hello, I want to contribute/maintain libcroco. http://www.freespiders.org/projects/libcroco/ The Libcroco project is an effort to build a generic Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) parsing and manipulation toolkit that can be used by GNOME applications in need of CSS support. setup.hint: === category:

Re: [HEADSUP] A new policy. First victim: Gerrit

Gerrit, On Jun 14 15:58, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > > For a start, we (cgf and I, that is) grant Gerrit the right, to add new > > package to the Cygwin net distro without review and by just getting one > > vote, if nobody else vetos the package within a week. > > Wow, thanks! Btw., you still need

Re: gtk-docs path

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit P. Haase wrote: | What about the gtk-doc location? | | GLib and friends put their docs into ${prefix}/share/gtk-doc by default. | Ok to go with this path? I don't see why not. This is supposed to be a common directory for all the GNOME libs docu

Re: gtk-docs path

Hi Yaakov, > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > | What about the gtk-doc location? > | > | GLib and friends put their docs into ${prefix}/share/gtk-doc by default. > | Ok to go with this path? > I don't see why not. This is supposed to be a common directory for all > the GNOME libs documentation, and AFAI

Re: [ITP] atk-1.6.1-1

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hello, > > I want to contribute/maintain ATK. > Canonical website: http://www.gtk.org/ > > Runtime package setup.hint: > === > category: Libs Devel > requires: cygwin libiconv2 libintl2 glib2 > sdesc: "low-level core library - runtime library"

Re: [ITP-2] glib-2.4.2-1 (NOT YET)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit P. Haase wrote: | Renamed & repackaged tarballs: | http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/glib2-2.4.2-1.tar.bz2 | http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/setup.hint | | http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/gtk+/glib/glib2-devel-2.4.2-1.tar.bz2 | http://anfaenge

Please upload: audiofile-0.2.6-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dr. Volker Zell wrote: | > http://cygwin-ports.sourceforge.net/install/release/audiofile/audiofile-0.2.6-1-src.tar.bz2 | > http://cygwin-ports.sourceforge.net/install/release/audiofile/audiofile-0.2.6-1.tar.bz2 | > http://cygwin-ports.source

Re: [ITP] atk-1.6.1-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit P. Haase wrote: | Hello, | | I want to contribute/maintain ATK. | Canonical website: http://www.gtk.org/ +1 from me. Yaakov -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozde

Re: [ITP] libcroco-0.5.1-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit P. Haase wrote: | Hello, | | I want to contribute/maintain libcroco. | http://www.freespiders.org/projects/libcroco/ | | The Libcroco project is an effort to build a generic Cascading Style | Sheet (CSS) parsing and manipulation toolkit that can

Re: [ITP-2] glib-2.4.2-1

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: I want to contribute/maintain glib. I can't vote, but this seems good to go. I installed it, replacing an older version that I was using for the Midnight Commander and irssi I build some time ago. -- How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contac

Re: [ITP-2] glib-2.4.2-1 (NOT YET)

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: If we've decided to keep this in /usr, then the binary packages look good to me; programs built against previous versions of glib2 are working fine, and I built perl-Glib against this and it passed all its tests. Since GLib isn't a GNOME or graphical

Generic build script instructions

Igor et. al., Are there any instructions for using the generic build script, aside from what's documented in the gdb itself? I'm looking at using the gbs for a couple of packages, and I'm trying to understand how it was intended to be used. Right now, it looks like it's something like: 1)