On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> Op Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:11:22 -0400 (EDT) schreef Igor Pechtchanski:
> : On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> :
> : > Op Fri, 18 Jun 2004 22:22:59 -0400 (EDT) schreef Igor Pechtchanski:
>
> [reason for not submitting packages?]
> : > One, (s-lan
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Since I have gtk-doc installed and I'm the maintainer tobe I don't see
why it is needed to remove the flag. However, it is not much more work
as I already have loaded on my plate to provide also a gtk-doc package
since it is a prerequisite to build gnome packages (at least f
No one has reviewed my subversion source package, so I started tried to do it myself,
by trying to build in a new clean minimal
cygwin install.
I found and fixed number of problems - mostly missing build requirements - and a final
build in the clean environment completed OK.
Therefore, I'd like
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hello,
I want to contribute/maintain Pango.
Canonical website: http://www.pango.org/
This is number three of four of the base/core GNOME libraries.
+1 from me. But how long before glib2 is ready to go?
Runtime package setup.hint:
===
category: Libs Devel Text
requires: cygwi
